Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade (mark) on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students?
From a general point of view, student stratum of the society are considered as one of the most noticeable part, owing to the fact that they are the future citizens of the country and the societies' future thrive contributes to them. In this vein, the quality of their education is controversial and often provokes many discussion. Some people keep endorsing the claim that the same mark should be assigned to the whole members of a class group who work on a project whereas others dismiss this. Personally, it is my firm conviction that teachers should not assign the same grade for all students in a group. In what follows, I aptly elucidate the rationale my perspective is based on.
To commerce, it is crystal clear that it does not seems fair to who are industrious that all students get the same mark, although they work on the same project. To put it in a vivid picture, all members in a group does not particularly put the same effort on the project and some students readily are not tempted to work on some projects, and may choose to work less. On the other hand, some others are intrinsically less smart and agile than others and present a different level of success in the same material. Therefore, each one should be graded based on oneself effort and knowledge that have endowed to the project. My experience during the freshman is a compelling example of this notion. When I was student, we were inflicted to work in groups made up of 5 student on an urban space analyzing project. Although it was very important to me to work hard on my assigned part and learn as much as I can beside earning a good grade, however, my classmates were not caring as me; So, they did not carry out their duties well which lead to the failure of the project and end up with the worst grade for all of us regardless of our separate responsibilities. Had the professor assigned a grade based on the effort that each student had had put on the project, my overall grade would not have decreased to that extend.
The second pivotal reason that bears in mind is that, this grading system will discourage diligent students from being the best version of themselves. In other words, since the student knows that if other members do not try enough and the overall project does not yield in satisfying ramification then the teacher will not assign a good grade for them, one will be discouraged from accomplishing one's task well. This is because the student is aware that just one of the member's thrive and endeavor does not come in to account and other's inaction is impressing. Considering my aforementioned example, I lost my interest in keeping working when I knew that their laziness affect the overall grade for us.
To put it in a nutshell, students should not be assigned the same grade of the others working in the same project. This is because not only it is not fair to them, but also it will discourage them from presenting whole their abilities and skills as they are aware of the adverse effect of other's incompetent performance.
- salvage logging 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave 76
- TPO 48- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 70
- colonization on asteroids 80
- Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you have never taken before Why 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun discussion seems to be countable; consider using: 'many discussions'.
Suggestion: many discussions
...ion is controversial and often provokes many discussion. Some people keep endorsing the claim t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 51, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seem'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: seem
...e, it is crystal clear that it does not seems fair to who are industrious that all st...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 51, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'seem'
Suggestion: seem
...e, it is crystal clear that it does not seems fair to who are industrious that all st...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 766, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'student' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'students'.
Suggestion: students
...nflicted to work in groups made up of 5 student on an urban space analyzing project. Al...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1233, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...e based on the effort that each student had had put on the project, my overall grade wo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... will be discouraged from accomplishing ones task well. This is because the student ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 546, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... come in to account and others inaction is impressing. Considering my aforementioned example,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2493.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 539.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62523191095 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81833721656 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59931946231 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465677179963 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 778.5 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.2013214252 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.210526316 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3684210526 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316410047118 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107136471122 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891256069171 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201586436207 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690706769322 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.1575268817 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.