Debates about wheater to help others are usually displayed in our society nowadays. Some individuals think that we need not help people we don’t know because we need to protect ourselves. However, I think today’s people are more glad to help others than before. I will elaborate on my discussion for three reasons.
First of all, nowadays people have more chances to help others than they were in the past. In the past, we always worked and deal with life around our own families and neighbors, so even though we desire to help others, we usually didn't have chances or methods. Today, we have modern lives and we can connect with others more, thus we can help more people we don’t know. Take a small village into account, in the past, the residents in the village knew each other and no one got familiar with the outside world. In a modern village, people can know the news of the village, and then they can send their clothing or food to whoever may need it.
Second, education makes people more glad to help others than before. Without education, people are always focusing on themselves, and people often see others as hostile. On the other hand, uneducated people do not often help their families and neighborhoods, not to mention a person they don’t know. In contrast, in today’s world people can get more teaching and are taught to be a kindness to others. Some education institutes will hold some activities to help people who have a concern about helping others. In many countries, some charity organizations can get benefit from people who get educated by local schools. In such schools, teachers give adolescents the thinking that helping others is somewhat a helping to themselves.
Last but not least, some people may have an idea that today’s people are busier than before, so they have no time to help others. Nevertheless, even though people in this modern world have more issues to focus on and more affairs to do, they still have some methods to give help to others. For example, we have smartphones now, and we can exploit them to transfer money to whom need to buy what they need, and we also can use the phone to call a host when we find his/her lost cat. There are a lot of technological approaches for us to give other people a hand and establish a connection with them. Modern society gives us more facilitate ways to help each other. We can see a lot of people join some activities which advocate people to help children in Africa, who don’t have enough food or clean water.
In conclusion, discussing a social issue need a lot of observation and understanding. However, I think people are more glad to help others, particularly whom they don’t know.
- Some people suggest that using a cleaner energy to protect the environment is better but some people say the traditional energy sources such as coal and oil is less expensive what is your suggestion 73
- Some people believe that friendships become stronger when friends enjoy good times together Others believe that friendships become stronger when friends talk about their problems with each other and support each other Which of these two approaches do you 90
- recording wedding or graduation events 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Some people believe that friendships become stronger when friends enjoy good times together Others believe that friendships become stronger when friends talk about their problems with each other and support each other Which of these two approaches do you 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...gh we desire to help others, we usually didnt have chances or methods. Today, we have...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, then, thus, for example, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2234.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74309978769 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48988559862 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464968152866 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3147604507 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0833333333 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458170785266 0.236089414692 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156636881897 0.076458572812 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900485895568 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291430472592 0.150856017488 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493372458023 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.