The only effective way for governments to encourage energy conservation is to increase the price of gasoline and electricity.
Some people think the only effective way for governments to encourage energy conservation is to increase the price of gasoline and electricity. However, in my opinion, putting financial burden on people is not an effective way to conserve energy. The reasons are that it may cause citizen’s opposition and there are other good ways of preserving energy.
To begin with, citizens will be against the action to increase the cost of gasoline and electricity. These utilities are what people need to use everyday and cannot live without. However, the governments’ choice to increase the price of those can result in people’s anxiety and stress, especially to those of low income. Not only does it cause people to become worried, but also has a huge impact on people who work in the related field. If the cost of gasoline and electricity rises, the consumption of those would decline, which is what the governments want. However, if the situation persists, some employees could lose their jobs and the employment rate would drop. For example, my sister worked at a travel agency a few years ago. When the government limited tourism, many of her coworkers got laid off. She was very miserable, but there was nothing she could do. In turn, she became very angry and resentful toward the government.
On top of that, there are plenty of other renewable energy sources that the governments can consider. There are clean energy sources such as solar power, energy from ocean waves, or wind energy. If the governments invest in this kind of new methods of getting energy, they would be able to conserve a significant amount of gasoline and electricity. According to a study from Department of Environmental Science at Harvard University, people using solar power at their homes during daytime can save up to twenty percent of the total energy consumption. Accordingly, using renewable energy sources can be the best way to save energy in the long term.
To sum up, increasing the cost of gasoline and electricity results in dissatisfaction from many people, and there are other sources of energy options that can be taken into account. In this regard, I believe increasing gasoline and electricity rates is not an appropriate way to save energy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-30 | greentea | 62 | view |
| 2022-01-12 | Pooja dave | 79 | view |
| 2021-01-16 | GPATO | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | haoboooo | 66 | view |
| 2015-08-23 | fred042102 | 63 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most effective way for government to encourage energy conservation is increasing the price of gasoline and electricity 86
- The only effective way for governments to encourage energy conservation is to increase the price of gasoline and electricity 62
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most effective way for government to encourage energy conservation is increasing the price of gasoline and electricity 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Some people think the only effective way...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...e utilities are what people need to use everyday and cannot live without. However, the g...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...nments’ choice to increase the price of those can result in people’s anxiety and stress, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, may, so, for example, kind of, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04021447721 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77387273918 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533512064343 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1576371692 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.65 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398899271273 0.236089414692 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110208270745 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147767235406 0.0737576698707 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257885656635 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130004330704 0.0645574589148 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.