in order to be well informed, a person must get information from many different resources
Throughout history, people have tried to find some ways to get information about every things. Nowadays, by improvement of technology, people have several resources like TV, Internet and social medias. A controversial question which is often raised regarding to this issue is whether a person get his/her information from different resources is well informed or not. I personally contend that getting information from several resources is more beneficial for a person to become well informed. I will elaborate on my point of view through the following paragraphs.
The first reason comin to mind about my idea is that different resources provide several information from several aspects and these several aspects broad the people's horizen and a person with a broad horizen is a vey well informed person. As an example, professor Ansari is one of famous economic professor in our university. He is famous because he is a person with a boad horizen and students and other professors and some times the president of university consult with him about their problems and professor Ansari by his broad information help them to make a good decision.
The other reason I would like to bring about my opinion is that some resources provide detail information about a issue and some of resources only provide a abstract about a issue and if a person get information from news resources with detail information can reduce confusion and provide more accurate data that help people to reduce their confusion. For instance, last month, my professor wants me to provide a presentation about marin ecosystem of Persian Golf, so at first I used google and intenten to find information but I became so confused because in each page and each articles I would find only some information that they not related to each other, finally I wanted to my professor to introduce me some extra resources and my professor gave a book about history of Persian golf that the information in this book make a great congruency in my finfing and reduced my confusion.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that getting information from many different resources is more beneficial for a person to become a well informed person. So by getting information from several resources people can reduce their confusion and broad their horison. All in all, it is highly recommended that people get information frome several different resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-17 | paris.alaei@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment. Which one of the following three actions is most useful for people to do if they want to help the environment in their local community? Explain why? Increase access 66
- The reading claims that the using Fuel-cell engines have several advantags than the using internal -comustion engine as a main source of automobile's power. However, the lecture finds all the idea dubious and provides some evidence to refute them all 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?it is difficult for teachers to be both popular and effective in helping students in learning. 66
- the way people dresses is a good indication of his or her personality 60
- in order to be well informed, a person must get information from many different resources 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 82, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some information'.
Suggestion: some information
...dea is that different resources provide several information from several aspects and these several ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ources provide detail information about a issue and some of resources only provid...
^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the resources') or simply say ''some resources''.
Suggestion: some of the resources; some resources
...de detail information about a issue and some of resources only provide a abstract about a issue a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ssue and some of resources only provide a abstract about a issue and if a person ...
^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...resources only provide a abstract about a issue and if a person get information f...
^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...onclusion that getting information from many different resources is more beneficial for a pers...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 372, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...ended that people get information frome several different resources.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, regarding, so, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07481296758 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84712901332 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441396508728 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 664.2 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 127.589764201 48.9658058833 261% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 156.538461538 100.406767564 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8461538462 20.6045352989 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348487695353 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162080690914 0.076458572812 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140077535367 0.0737576698707 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262117890318 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116554473525 0.0645574589148 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 11.7677419355 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 58.1214874552 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.1575268817 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.