Our current lifestyle has a negative impact on our future generation. Do you agree or disagree?
I believe that our future generation will face negative consequences the way we deal with the current situation and live our lives. Their lives would be more difficult and different from ours, moreover, they might face darker effects because of the reasons that I will present in subsequent essays.
First of all, we are dealing with extreme deforestation which is the primary current issue. Cutting down the tremendous number of trees and converting the forest area into major cities and markets. As a result, our future generations will not able to explore nature, hence they will never get the chance to appreciate it. In turn, they will get more and more involved in the world of gadgets and technology, which might cause several negatives outgrowths. To illustrate, a few decades ago, in my hometown, we have lots of trees and forest areas, but now all the forests are turned into a bustling city. During my childhood days, I and my friends used to spent a lot of time outside the house in the forest. We used to go camping and enjoy the forest area, but now the story is completely different. Today, in my hometown children do not have a forest area as we had. Thus, they stay home and get occupied with their gadgets, missing all the enjoyment that they could easily do if we haven’t chopped down all the trees.
Moreover, children, these days suffer from multiple and long term health-related problems due to change in the climate. The reason behind this is we have cut down all the trees, which helps in maintaining the oxygen and carbon dioxide level in the atmosphere. As a result, greenhouse gas accumulates, causing a sudden change in the climate. Due to which, our kids are vulnerable to respiratory diseases. For instance, again in my hometown, earlier there were very fewer children with respiratory illness but nowadays, most of the children are suffering from harmful ailments. New York Times has reported that there is a 30% increase in children with the disease and it is more likely to increase in the future. Therefore, I consider that it is time to recover our forest area by growing trees and encouraging others to follow the same, otherwise, our future generations will be in danger.
In conclusion, because of deforestation, we have put their lives in peril because they will not get a chance to appreciate nature and they will suffer from serious health-related problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 80 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Compare and contrast learning by doing to learning by reading In your opinion which is better Explain 70
- do you agree or disagree, when p[eople succeed, it is entirely based on hard work. Luck has nothing to do with their success. 70
- Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87804878049 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67719565246 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526829268293 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0300736189 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.263157895 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5789473684 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143189868694 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500345996451 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087662056088 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961294832958 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702185266422 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.