Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.
Some people think that parents nowadays are more helpful to their children than parents in the past. People think that because the advance in technology, today’s parents become more knowledgeable and helpful for their children. Although I understand their point of view, I have a different opinion. I believe that parents in the past are more helpful to their children. The basis of my opinion is educational ,social and personal.
From the educational perspective, parents were considered to be the most important example to their children. Parents passed on value to their children. Parents were the best role model to their children. They were the most valued source of education. The education was only enclosed between school and home. Parents in the past were able to help their children in homework and all their school work. On the other hand, nowadays there are many other sources of education in which children can rely on. For instance, with the advancement in technology all students have access to internet. Each student has his own laptop. Students today are in no need to their parents help. All students can surf the internet and get information and help through their computers. That is why I consider parents in the past were more involved in their children’s education.
Socially, the social lives of moms in the past allowed them to be more involved in their children’s education. In the past moms had more time to spend with their children and were involved in their education process. For instance, I can remember when I was a child in primary school, after coming back from school my mom was always at home waiting for us. She prepared a healthy meal. She stared to study and helped us to understand the curriculum better. All her attentions and care were managed toward us. However, today’s moms are really busy. They are working or studying for an advanced degree to get a better job. Moms today are not involved in their children’s education as before. The school and the technology are the best sources of information to lead children in their education. In the past the social life style was really accommodated for all parents to help their children educationally.
Personally, for me as I am a mom and I have three children, I am not involved in my kid’s education as my mom was. I am working full time. I have to take care of my home, such as, shopping, cleaning and every day home tasks. I do not have time to stay with my kids and help them in their homework. In contrast, my mom was only taking care of the home and us. All her responsibilities were to help us to success in our education. That is why I believe that parents today are not involved in their children education.
In conclusion for the reasons I mentioned above, I completely agree that parents in the past were more involved in their children’s education than parents today. Nowadays technology and advancement prohibit many parents from helping their children. Parents today are really busy to consume their time to help children in their education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | godwin_111 | 3 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | godwin_111 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | mohammadkmi | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | marysv | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | mohammadkmi | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Some people think that parents nowadays ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 419, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
.... The basis of my opinion is educational ,social and personal. From the e...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... educational ,social and personal. From the educational perspective, parent...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir children's education. Socially, the social lives of moms in th...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng back from school my mom was always at home waiting for us. She prepared a heal...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to help their children educationally. Personally, for me as I am a mom and ...
^^^^
Line 10, column 137, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...s education as my mom was. I am working full time. I have to take care of my home, such ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 235, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ing, cleaning and every day home tasks. I do not have time to stay with my kids a...
^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nvolved in their children education. In conclusion for the reasons I mentione...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, really, so, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 69.0 43.0788530466 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2580.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 525.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91428571429 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79589203026 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.392380952381 0.524837075471 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 800.1 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 38.0 20.6003584229 184% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3182219312 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.8947368421 100.406767564 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8157894737 20.6045352989 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44736842105 5.45110844103 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 11.8709677419 202% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.599034147892 0.236089414692 254% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189030479461 0.076458572812 247% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188142054822 0.0737576698707 255% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.450249777245 0.150856017488 298% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15930829933 0.0645574589148 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.