A mistake people do not learn from is a mistake would be repeated. Some people say that the failed experiences could encourage people thinking how to do things differently. By contrast, others tend to say that sometimes people reject to admit their mistakes because of the sense of embarrassment. Self-introspection and self-development is essential evolutionary motivations in human history. In these perspectives, I side with the opinion that people can learn from mistakes.
To begin with, the mistake with the most negative consequences is the one reason could transform us. Take the medical experiences in Taiwan for example; in 2002, Taiwan was facing a lethal disease outbreak. At that time, the inappropriate central commands and the lack of awareness in virus mortality rate had caused many excellent doctors and citizen died, people lived in panic of infectious virus and suffered the great sorrow of loss in family. The huge sacrifice in society make government examine how to improve the standard of disease control and combine the technical instruments to reconstruct the public health care system. After seventeen years, another fatal virus pandemic spreads around the world, the administrator of health department in Taiwan not only organizes the medical team to provide the health treatments immediately, but also helps other countries to defend the illness. Though the disaster had occurred, people can get lessons from it and adjust their reactions to avoid the same mistake.
In addition, mistakes are pivotal in personal development and lead to massive growth. Failure indicates what kind of knowledge, insight and skills we need to improve. For instance, the invention of electric bulb is failed for hundreds of thousands of times. Thomas Alva Edison, the inventor, he obtained the crucial characters of different chemical materials and the temperature impact. After modifying the prescription for countless times, he finally lightens up the bulb successfully. Hence, the self-insight and self-cultivation are the experience people could gain from mistakes.
In sum, people can learn from mistakes since the process of accepting consequences can be a great teacher. The self-introspection helps people to see their faults; self-development could make people establish stronger abilities to the next challenges. Living like someone who pays attention to his errors is really intelligent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, really, so, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55555555556 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12266628366 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607046070461 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.120323747 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.45 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340680478911 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981981318426 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122519099502 0.0737576698707 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223144584723 0.150856017488 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138694279736 0.0645574589148 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.