Some people think that changing job after working in the same position a few years can not only develop the adaptation abilities but also gain various professional skills. By contrast, others tend to say that people staying in the same job could lay a solid foundation and be an expert in one field. I prefer change jobs to work in identical position because making some adjustments in people's career would help them learn new knowledge at work and cultivate multi-disciplinary skills to reach higher goals.
To begin with, learning new things is crucial to workers survive in the fierce competition society. Nowadays, new automatic machines and artificial intelligent software are created to do the routine tasks for human. Therefore, people who know how to grapple with problems by latest tools could be a time-efficient worker. Moreover, new challenges such as the different corporate cultures and the ingenious colleagues would encourage people to contrive themselves in innovative research. As a result, learning new tools and taking new challenges would enhance people’s adaptation abilities and help them be outstanding candidates in the labor market.
Additionally, people with multi-disciplinary skills could make impressive contribution for company. A successful worker needs the basic senses of different fields as well as interpersonal skills to deal with difficulties. For instance, a system developer changes his job and works as a product manager. The new position could make him realize the demands from clients and to propose the appropriate report to supervisor with his technical background. On the other hand, the good coordination abilities such as communicating with supervisors, cooperating with other departments and maintaining relationship with key customers are essential to achieve a great team work. Hence, the worker will gain these cross-fields skills gradually and to expand his career path.
In sum, accumulating new knowledge and acquiring a wider range of techniques are the two vital reasons which I support the people should change job. These challenges are conducive to stimulate people’s potential and could broaden their work horizon.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One can learn about another person by the books and movies that person likes. 66
- Some people believe that a good ability of adapting or adjusting to a new condition or circumstance is more important than knowledge in a job or in a field What do you think 76
- People always learn from their mistakes 89
- In the future students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television or of studying at traditional schools Which would you prefer Use reasons and specific details to explain your choice 76
- Some people believe that a good ability of adapting or adjusting to a new condition or circumstance is more important than knowledge in a job or in a field. What do you think? 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 334.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55688622754 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11718491039 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610778443114 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6437258592 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157712850246 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529188847509 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519526483433 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110213379121 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734169010494 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.