People always think that the computerized programs or other high-tech products do not benefit people through ages.
High-tech products or computerized programs benefit senior citizens. For one thing, technology plays a role in helping protect and save the lives of many seniors. For example, fall detection devices can sense when seniors are in dangerous situations, which means that, with these systems, seniors can alert caretakers and contact them for help by simply pressing a button on a wristband or a necklace. For another thing, computerized programs increase the security of financial account for senior citizens. Specifically, apps such as EverSafe alert seniors and their relatives of any unusual financial activity within their bank accounts, which means that they are able to be notified as soon as possible. Thus, the possibility of stealing becomes low, as it is clear that thief is afraid of notifications to the owner of money.
To the aspect of adolescents, computerized programs or high-tech products also bring benefits. On one hand, the reason given to explain this is that computerized programs makes it much easier for children to find information. Compared to the past that children have to ask others for questions or have to search information from books, today, they could just type some words with using of browsers such as firefox, chrome, and so on, which means that these computerized programs make nearly all the knowledge available to children. On another hand, youths are with unmatured immune system, which means that they are more susceptible to diseases. Thanks to the high-tech products like genetic medicine, amounts of diseases that children infect can be cured. Accordingly, it is natural that we conceive high-tech products benefit adolescents, as, in some circumstance, they rescue life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-28 | Quan Jingyu | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 403, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... a button on a wristband or a necklace. For another thing, computerized programs in...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, so, thus, another thing, for example, such as, for another thing, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 271.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34686346863 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83586958246 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590405904059 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5705557201 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.75 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.53405017921 44% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182322544416 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910110439157 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112931198403 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144931829521 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542748467648 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.