People learn things better from those at their own level--such as fellow students or co-workers--from those at a higher level, such as teachers and supervisors.
Reasonable people always say that learning is a process and we can learn a wide variety of topics such as science, business, law and so on and so forth. Since learning things is a broad term, let's assume that the definition of learning in this case is to absorb knowledge in former topics mentioned. In this circumstance, I disagree to the extent that people learn things better from those with similar lever than from those at a higher level. There are three key points on why learning from teachers and supervisors are much advantageous than learning from fellow students and co-workers.
First and foremost, people with a higher level undoubtedly have more experince than us in dealing with problems. Take, for example, if someone is a new worker in a petrochemical industry. In order to understand the process of producing fertilizer, the worker will need training and assistance from supervisor. If he merely learns from inexperienced worker, then the chance for him to make mistakes will be higher since he doesn't know clearly his job responsibility and the industry process which is very complex.
Second, the information we get from teachers and supervisors is also more credible because they have dealt with such a specialized background for a long time. For example, students who study chemistry for the first time often feel confused with the high complexity of solving organic chemistry problems. However, by asking questions to teachers, they would get more guidance and find those questions easier.
Last but least, nowadays, life becomes more competitive and people sometimes don't want to share their knowledge one another. Being individualistic, they fight for awards in work place, strive for gold medal in science competitions and so on and so forth. As a result, it's more problematic to learn from people with similar level because those greedy people only focus on developing themselves. Those people are afraid than others would be better than themselves, thus causing learning things from those at similar level become difficult.
To reiterate, I strongly believe that people at a higher level, including but not limited to teachers and supervisors, make us much easier to absorb knowledge because they have more experience and credible knowledge. On the other hand, people at similar level usually don't want to share their knowledge and focus on enhancing their capabilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-09-08 | aditheodosius | 70 | view |
- Smart cars 86
- A person should not take an important decision alone. 70
- People learn things better from those at their own level--such as fellow students or co-workers--from those at a higher level, such as teachers and supervisors. 70
- Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information can create problems. Which view do you agree with? 86
- Dinosaurs 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 591, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng from fellow students and co-workers. First and foremost, people with a higher...
^^^
Line 2, column 423, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...o make mistakes will be higher since he doesnt know clearly his job responsibility and...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s more competitive and people sometimes dont want to share their knowledge one anoth...
^^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...r hand, people at similar level usually dont want to share their knowledge and focus...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'for example', 'such as', 'as a result', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238317757009 0.229887763892 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.142523364486 0.158761421928 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.102803738318 0.0866891130778 119% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0654205607477 0.046263068375 141% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0467289719626 0.0685040099705 68% => OK
Prepositions: 0.147196261682 0.118717715034 124% => OK
Participles: 0.035046728972 0.0351676179071 100% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.79240059139 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0257009345794 0.0309702414327 83% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0700934579439 0.0887237588012 79% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0116822429907 0.0209618222197 56% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00700934579439 0.0139019557991 50% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2401.0 2387.08602151 101% => OK
No of words: 388.0 408.028673835 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.1881443299 5.86048508987 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.394329896907 0.338922669872 116% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.270618556701 0.251872472559 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.203608247423 0.174417080927 117% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.136597938144 0.112833075102 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79240059139 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528350515464 0.524397521467 101% => OK
Word variations: 58.6256810198 59.2087087015 99% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6684587814 82% => OK
Sentence length: 22.8235294118 20.5533526081 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1556551662 48.84282405 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.235294118 120.699889404 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8235294118 20.5533526081 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.764705882353 0.644075263715 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 49.8853850819 45.7405998639 109% => OK
Elegance: 1.65137614679 1.45489161554 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34799502028 0.300154397459 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.105811746318 0.103427244359 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0713050304776 0.0752933317313 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.526095117846 0.497263757937 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.11190324932 0.151897553556 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12194014888 0.114077575197 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976488579628 0.0781384742642 125% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.248920275266 0.336927656856 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0651066351317 0.067059652881 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20376462932 0.210909579961 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934391474118 0.0618886996521 151% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8870967742 59% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 8.42114695341 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.4623655914 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.