People should be able to take criticism from other members in order to succeed in a group project.
Criticism is one of the most significant factors when participating in various group projects. Regarding this, some people argue that it is not necessary to take criticism in a group project to become successful. However, I personally agree with the statement above for two reasons.
First and foremost, taking in criticism can perfect the project. To be specific, team members can provide their opinions , such as extra explanation in the details or a change in the design of the project. By accepting such criticisms from other group members, the project will be more perfect, leading to success. For instance, during the Manhattan Projects, brilliant minds from all over the world gathered in the United States to create a weapon of mass destruction which would end the global war swiftly. The head scientist, Oppenheimer was leading the group in making the world’s first atomic bomb. Throughout the process, other scientists from different nations gave critiques on his ideas and designs, which Oppenheimer welcomed, and because of his acceptance of criticisms, World War II ended quickly. This clearly shows that one can become more successful if they take in criticism.
In addition, taking criticism can contribute to one’s positive development. In fact, people can develop while welcoming criticism, such as accepting one’s fault or a deficient part in the project. As a result, one can broaden his perspective and become more mature, having ease in creating new relationships while socializing. To illustrate, when I was a university student, I had a group project with contentious people. While accepting criticisms from others, I acquired the ability to understand and apply novel ideas. Eventually, these experiences helped me become more open-minded and flexible. This demonstrates that taking criticism enhances one internally.
In conclusion, in my opinion, criticisms can perfect the projects and enhance one’s ability to socialize. Admittedly, some could argue that members could give unnecessary advice and people can still get a good grade despite not taking in critical advice. However, one can also learn critical thinking while discerning the criticisms, and people can have successful grades more easily if they take in criticism.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-11 | danielkim736 | 83 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for teachers to get along with their students than to have a lot of knowledge 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for teachers to get along with their students than to have a lot of knowledge 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for teachers to get along with their students than to have a lot of knowledge 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In my country young people have better lives than their parents had when they were young Use reasons and examples to support your answer 85
- People should be able to take criticism from other members in order to succeed in a group project 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... team members can provide their opinions , such as extra explanation in the detail...
^^
Line 7, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e can have successful grades more easily if they take in criticism.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, still, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47293447293 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92598603983 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566951566952 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1292729296 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.05 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.55 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291860589554 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976499451426 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751493506529 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190212804642 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313718354429 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.