people who give extra money to charity or good are happier than people who spend their money on themselves
Recently, the concept of happiness is an issue that everyone thinks about. Some people believe that having lots of money could be a source of happiness; However, others claim that giving money to people who are in need is more joyful. From a personal perspective, sharing money with others is a vital source of happiness given that peolpe feel more contributed and engaging.
The first and foremost point, provided that people give extra money to charity, they could help their communities. A vivid example of that doctor Mgdy Yacoub is a famous cardiologist; furthermore, he has a charm, benevolent and generous work for underprivileged children. To that end, he founded The Chain Of Hope Foundation in 1995, which put experts in touch together in order to perform life-saving heart procedures. Likewise, until now 15 million children from more than 25 developing countries have been treated. Although he is a very rich man, he said that having money is not the main reason for happiness, but helping others is the real meaning of pleasure. Consequently, people who help their communities by sharing money and services are happier.
Next, coupled with benefit communities, feel interesting is another virtue of giving money. For instance, people in developed countries, such as Canada and the United States celebrate Christmas by offering poor people money, clothes and toys. In other words, people in this event feel happier when they donate and share their items to spread a little Christmas spirit to those who really need it. In addition to that, it is a good opportunity for parents to teach their kids to think about others. Therefore, donating money is imperative for happiness.
Taking everything into consideration; without a doubt, people who give extra money to charity or a god are happy not only because they could help their communities, but also they feel more engaging. It is suggested that parents teach their kids to share their items to protect them from being selfish.
- do you agree or disagree, people should not spend lots od money on pets? 80
- tpo 54 3
- tpo 26 zebra mussels invasion 81
- do you agree or disagree? people benefit more from traveling in their own countries than traveling to foreign countries? 73
- Parents should encourage their children to take part-time jobs 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ems to protect them from being selfish.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, really, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10397553517 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70636845781 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590214067278 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1217906862 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.3125 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 5.45110844103 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411145834743 0.236089414692 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131608472749 0.076458572812 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121941272777 0.0737576698707 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259902900128 0.150856017488 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232368733069 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.