planting genetically trees
According to the reading planting genetically trees are better than local trees in areas. However, all three reason can be challenged and are not practical and convincing enough.
First, genetically modified trees are more likely to survive than native trees. Nevertheless, if some virus or beat which can damage trees unmodified trees can be more stable in natural areas than modified trees, because genetically modified trees are like each other so if they attack by some external factors all of them would be died. But in native trees diversity protect them to die.
Second, modified trees need spend more money because their seed are more expensive than local trees, moreover if farmer cultivate native trees they will be able use their seeds to cultivate another trees, however the modified trees do not have seed which can growth, so farmer always spend more money every time.
Finally, although genetically modified trees can grow faster, but it can damage to natural areas, cause of they use more resource than native trees. Thus native trees loos this competition and become extinct.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ey use more resource than native trees. Thus native trees loos this competition and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 43.0788530466 21% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 52.1666666667 23% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 1977.66487455 47% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 178.0 407.700716846 44% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16853932584 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 4.48103885553 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31419762938 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 212.727598566 47% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556179775281 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 618.680645161 47% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.6003584229 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.4080822466 48.9658058833 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.45110844103 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340551266262 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189304718753 0.076458572812 248% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150664017126 0.0737576698707 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237451743166 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983248683703 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 86.8835125448 37% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ey use more resource than native trees. Thus native trees loos this competition and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 43.0788530466 21% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 52.1666666667 23% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 1977.66487455 47% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 178.0 407.700716846 44% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16853932584 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 4.48103885553 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31419762938 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 212.727598566 47% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556179775281 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 618.680645161 47% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.6003584229 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.4080822466 48.9658058833 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.45110844103 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340551266262 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189304718753 0.076458572812 248% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150664017126 0.0737576698707 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237451743166 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983248683703 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 86.8835125448 37% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.