Technology is a bit of double edged sword. Used right, it is a wonderful tool, but unfortunately it makes it easier for a lot of mediocre people to get crappy ideas out. As far as I am concerned, reading paper materials like books, magazines or newspaper is better than watching electronic devices to gain information. I have numerous reasons from my point of view, which i intend to delve into this essay. First of all, paper material have always been most trusted source. For instance take example of a book which is going to be published, the book will go through numerous processes which are; first of all, the author of the book always double check it for mistakes, then the book is read by publishers which then give permission for its publication only if it has right information. Every statement has there references, which make it easy for us to know about the source of the topic. Whereas, the information we receive on our electronic devices is mostly altered as, it is easy for mischievous people to make changes on their own. My real life experience is a compelling example of this, i saw this article in newspaper that in a survey it was found that most of the information provided on most used website 'Wikipedia' can be changed easily, and almost information there had been altered. So, this also provide one more reason that why books are more trusted. Secondly, electronic devices emitt rays which can be harmful for our eyes. Where as our books and other printed material reflect only non harmful rays. For instance, when i was in college, i used to do all my work with help of computer which then result in weakening of my eyesight and i end up with a big ugly specs on my nose. If i would have used books instead of electronic device my eyesight would have been fine. Thirdly, I believe that printed material like newspaper is the only trusted news form, as on social media every other account tend to be a news reporter which make things worse. For example, on social media recently a news got viral which was about death of a famous actor, the actor was ill, but some fake reporters put news about there demise on their social account but the truth came in next days newspaper that the actor was having some trouble in breathing. So, you see how things can easily take a different turn on other platforms. In conclusion, I reiterate my opinion by saying that one should always prefer paper material to gain information. This is because paper materials are checked before publishing, and do not have any side effect on our health and because they print the truth.
- air purifiers and there advantages 80
- Grades encourage students to work harder at school Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement Parents are the best teacher 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage Earth will eventually run out of resources and it is about time that we thought of another planet to live in In response to such con 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to go on a trip by oneself than to take a group tour with a guide Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 373, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...us reasons from my point of view, which i intend to delve into this essay. First ...
^
Line 1, column 1097, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...rience is a compelling example of this, i saw this article in newspaper that in a...
^
Line 1, column 1444, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...rays which can be harmful for our eyes. Where as our books and other printed material re...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1540, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ly non harmful rays. For instance, when i was in college, i used to do all my wor...
^
Line 1, column 1558, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...s. For instance, when i was in college, i used to do all my work with help of com...
^
Line 1, column 1655, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... result in weakening of my eyesight and i end up with a big ugly specs on my nose...
^
Line 1, column 1680, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'spec'?
Suggestion: spec
...y eyesight and i end up with a big ugly specs on my nose. If i would have used books ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 1698, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nd up with a big ugly specs on my nose. If i would have used books instead of elec...
^^
Line 1, column 1701, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...up with a big ugly specs on my nose. If i would have used books instead of electr...
^
Line 1, column 1703, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had used'?
Suggestion: had used
... with a big ugly specs on my nose. If i would have used books instead of electronic device my e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 2184, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...cial account but the truth came in next days newspaper that the actor was having som...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61739130435 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49550067712 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523913043478 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.1790844374 48.9658058833 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.789473684 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2105263158 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78947368421 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212293378171 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717127191114 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122046785594 0.0737576698707 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212293378171 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.