Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Global environmental damage cannot be overemphasize as it is a major concern in the world today. It is a known fact that human activities contribute greatly to the pollution on the environment . Some environmentalists believe that the government should be responsible for reducing global environmental pollution and not individuals, while, others argue that keeping the surroundings safe is the duty of individuals. I am of think that the government should take ownership and make the climate safe for her citizens to live in, by controlling the use of automobile and ensuring proper waste disposal.
First of all, one of the major reasons for the pollution of the environment is the uncontrolled use of automobiles, as these cars emit gases like carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons when the fossil fuels burn. If individuals can decide to change their lifestyle by cutting down on the use of their personal automobiles and go by public transport, this will enormously reduce emission of these toxic gases. For instance, In Nigeria, nearly every family owns at least two cars, if the government can pass a law, to curtail the use and purchase of cars, that will immensely reduce pollution in the atmosphere.
In addition, the government can play a significant role in ensuring the safety of the environment, by reducing the use of plastic products in our day-to-day life, which is a major contributor to the pollution of the surroundings. For example, when people go shopping at the supermarket, polythene bags are used to pack up the items purchased. most consumers do not dispose these bags properly, as a result they litter the surroundings, Instead of using these plastic bags individuals can opt for eco-friendly substitutes, such as paper bags and reusable material bags, as all these will drastically reduce pollution and prevent blockage of drains overtime due to the improper disposal pattern.
In conclusion, the damage on our climate today is a major concern and the government has a crucial role to play to reduce the harmful activities done by people to the surroundings, by passing laws that govern the use of automobiles and plastic bags.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | jenniferjack07 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | Seema Modak | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The government should spend more money on improving access to the Internet than on public transportation 91
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 79
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 79
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news During the same time period most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with th 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...atly to the pollution on the environment . Some environmentalists believe that the...
^^
Line 1, column 450, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...duals. I am of think that the government should take ownership and make the clima...
^^
Line 9, column 344, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Most
...re used to pack up the items purchased. most consumers do not dispose these bags pro...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, while, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16809116809 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1162687943 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532763532764 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.8895077854 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.909090909 100.406767564 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.9090909091 20.6045352989 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.45110844103 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165847695641 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072528929296 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790834966537 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112685196018 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790823852684 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 11.7677419355 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 58.1214874552 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.1575268817 163% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.