Seeing Is Believing: Hope For The Blind
Paul Ladis can't see his three daughters or his wife of 15 years, Beth. The former machinist from Roselle, Ill., has been legally blind for a decade. He was born with a hereditary disease called retinitis pigmentosa, a gradual decaying of the retina which affects 100,000 Americans and can lead to total blindness. Last year Ladis's brother told him of a company called Optobionics whose doctors were implanting the first artificial retinas. Ladis, 45, applied to be a test subject and, a few months later, walked into the Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center in Chicago.Today, a silicon chip two millimeters across sits in his eye, converting light into electrical signals that travel through the optic nerve to his brain. The technology is still in its infancy and offers no hope of a total cure. But Ladis says he now notices shapes, lights and motion instead of an inky gray darkness, and can function better around the house. "If I want to reach out and hug my kids, I can see them walking by me now," he says happily.Ten years ago, the idea of placing a tiny electronic device into the human eye seemed more suited to sci-fi than reality. Compared with the ear, where cochlear implants have been effectively converting sound into electrical impulses since the mid-'80s, the eye is a more sensitive and complex piece of human anatomy. But today, a dozen teams of scientists around the world are pursuing the goal of artificial eyesight for those who spend their days in darkness. They're proving that such technology is safe, and that it can improve the quality of life for the vision-impaired. Like Paul Ladis's bionic implant, the new devices do not cure ocular disease, and none are approved by the FDA for general use. Yet early promising results have spurred cautious optimism among ophthalmologists that the age of combating blindness has finally begun. "The concept is no longer laughable," says Gerald Chader, the chief scientist for the advocacy group Foundation Fighting Blindness. "There are patients living with implants that seem to work."The most prevalent disease researchers are targeting is macular degeneration. The affliction, which affects an estimated 11 million (mostly elderly) Americans, leaves a foggy black splotch at the center of the field of vision. Patients often must use huge closed-circuit TVs to magnify newspapers or books, or big, unwieldy head-mounted telescopes.--The Saratoga, Calif. based VisionCare wants to lighten their load. The IMT (Implantable Miniature Telescope) evolved out of Israeli research into optics and is roughly the size of a pea. Inserted into one eye like the intraocular lens in cataract surgery, it projects a magnified image over a wide field of the retina. After an hour long procedure, patients must undergo extensive training to learn to use the implanted telescope for central vision and the other untreated eye for mobility and peripheral vision. The device, now in FDA trials, has been implanted in more than 70 patients, and VisionCare scientists are very optimistic about early results. "For an 80-year-old to sit and watch TV or read headlines in a newspaper or pay their bills, it's a godsend," says Robert Kershner, a Tucson ophthalmologist involved in the trials.The IMT only augments eyesight in those with damaged retinas. Artificial implants that replace retinas, like the kind Paul Ladis received, are farther behind. Brothers Alan and Vincent Chow of Optobionics have implanted their microchips in 10 patients. The chips aren't actively powered; each contains 5,000 solar cells that convert light into electric impulses that stimulate weakened cells in the retina. Optobionics patients, Alan Chow says, are reporting "moderate to substantial improvement in vision." One patient, blind for decades, remarked to doctors that modern automobiles look ugly.Researchers at the Doheny Retina Institute at the University of Southern California are exploring a variation of the same idea. In the Doheny system, a camera on the patient's eyeglasses captures and transmits images to an implant. Patients also wear a battery pack that transmits power magnetically to a receptor behind the ear, which then sends electricity to the implant to stimulate nerve cells. Chader, of the Foundation Fighting Blindness, says he witnessed an evaluation of one of the Doheny Institute's three test patients: the man, blind for 30 years, was able to make out two of the big letters on the eye chart.Perhaps the most exciting aspect of all these devices is that they should get better quickly, now that medical researchers have hitched their wagon to ongoing improvements in microchips and miniaturization. For example, the Doheny chips currently include 16 electrodes, but professors there talk of next-generation implants that could include up to 100. Scientists at VisionCare theorize about one day allowing patients to control their implanted telescopes, zooming and changing focus like "The Six Million Dollar Man." The technology will take years to develop, but until gene researchers can locate and replace the chromosomes responsible for ocular disease, the devices will offer the best hope for the severely vision-impaired. Paul Ladis, for one, is enthusiastic. "I would love to see my kids' faces," he says. "I would love to read books to them. That would be fantastic."
Paul Ladis can't see his three daughters or his wife of 15 years, Beth. The former machinist from Roselle, Ill., has been legally blind for a decade. He was born with a hereditary disease called retinitis pigmentosa, a gradual decaying of the retina which affects 100,000 Americans and can lead to total blindness. Last year Ladis's brother told him of a company called Optobionics whose doctors were implanting the first artificial retinas. Ladis, 45, applied to be a test subject and, a few months later, walked into the Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center in Chicago.
Today, a silicon chip two millimeters across sits in his eye, converting light into electrical signals that travel through the optic nerve to his brain. The technology is still in its infancy and offers no hope of a total cure. But Ladis says he now notices shapes, lights and motion instead of an inky gray darkness, and can function better around the house. "If I want to reach out and hug my kids, I can see them walking by me now," he says happily.
Ten years ago, the idea of placing a tiny electronic device into the human eye seemed more suited to sci-fi than reality. Compared with the ear, where cochlear implants have been effectively converting sound into electrical impulses since the mid-'80s, the eye is a more sensitive and complex piece of human anatomy. But today, a dozen teams of scientists around the world are pursuing the goal of artificial eyesight for those who spend their days in darkness. They're proving that such technology is safe, and that it can improve the quality of life for the vision-impaired. Like Paul Ladis's bionic implant, the new devices do not cure ocular disease, and none are approved by the FDA for general use. Yet early promising results have spurred cautious optimism among ophthalmologists that the age of combating blindness has finally begun. "The concept is no longer laughable," says Gerald Chader, the chief scientist for the advocacy group Foundation Fighting Blindness. "There are patients living with implants that seem to work."
The most prevalent disease researchers are targeting is macular degeneration. The affliction, which affects an estimated 11 million (mostly elderly) Americans, leaves a foggy black splotch at the center of the field of vision. Patients often must use huge closed-circuit TVs to magnify newspapers or books, or big, unwieldy head-mounted telescopes.
--The Saratoga, Calif. based VisionCare wants to lighten their load. The IMT (Implantable Miniature Telescope) evolved out of Israeli research into optics and is roughly the size of a pea. Inserted into one eye like the intraocular lens in cataract surgery, it projects a magnified image over a wide field of the retina. After an hour long procedure, patients must undergo extensive training to learn to use the implanted telescope for central vision and the other untreated eye for mobility and peripheral vision. The device, now in FDA trials, has been implanted in more than 70 patients, and VisionCare scientists are very optimistic about early results. "For an 80-year-old to sit and watch TV or read headlines in a newspaper or pay their bills, it's a godsend," says Robert Kershner, a Tucson ophthalmologist involved in the trials.
The IMT only augments eyesight in those with damaged retinas. Artificial implants that replace retinas, like the kind Paul Ladis received, are farther behind. Brothers Alan and Vincent Chow of Optobionics have implanted their microchips in 10 patients. The chips aren't actively powered; each contains 5,000 solar cells that convert light into electric impulses that stimulate weakened cells in the retina. Optobionics patients, Alan Chow says, are reporting "moderate to substantial improvement in vision." One patient, blind for decades, remarked to doctors that modern automobiles look ugly.
Researchers at the Doheny Retina Institute at the University of Southern California are exploring a variation of the same idea. In the Doheny system, a camera on the patient's eyeglasses captures and transmits images to an implant. Patients also wear a battery pack that transmits power magnetically to a receptor behind the ear, which then sends electricity to the implant to stimulate nerve cells. Chader, of the Foundation Fighting Blindness, says he witnessed an evaluation of one of the Doheny Institute's three test patients: the man, blind for 30 years, was able to make out two of the big letters on the eye chart.
Perhaps the most exciting aspect of all these devices is that they should get better quickly, now that medical researchers have hitched their wagon to ongoing improvements in microchips and miniaturization. For example, the Doheny chips currently include 16 electrodes, but professors there talk of next-generation implants that could include up to 100. Scientists at VisionCare theorize about one day allowing patients to control their implanted telescopes, zooming and changing focus like "The Six Million Dollar Man." The technology will take years to develop, but until gene researchers can locate and replace the chromosomes responsible for ocular disease, the devices will offer the best hope for the severely vision-impaired. Paul Ladis, for one, is enthusiastic. "I would love to see my kids' faces," he says. "I would love to read books to them. That would be fantastic."
I have to write a summary of this article.
Brad Stone, a famous senior journalist has published in 2003 an article in a medical weekly newspaper about new technology applications as treatment for vision impairment suffers.
According to the text, two kinds of new alternatives were meant to be useful. The first one is about a microchip fitted into the eye that converts the light energy in electric impulses through the optic nerve to the brain. The second one is an implantable miniature telescope insert into the eye. A few amount of patients has applied to testing the devices yet these so-called innovation are not considered as truly as a cure even though they improve the quality life of the suffers.
This article emphasis the achievement to make the life better however I believe those treatments to be very expensive so much as not everyone who suffers from vision loss could afford them.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2016-10-08 | TheFrenchWarrior | 60 | view |
- Seeing Is Believing: Hope For The BlindPaul Ladis can't see his three daughters or his wife of 15 years, Beth. The former machinist from Roselle, Ill., has been legally blind for a decade. He was born with a hereditary disease called retinitis pigmentosa, 60
- IELTS Writing Task 2 IELTS Essay I found that topic in my TOEFL iBT preparation book also You should spend about 40 minutes on this task It is said that Not everything that is learned is contained in books Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experi 76
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible. Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer period. Which of these situation do you think is better ? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opin 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Brad Stone, a famous senior journalist h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun amount seems to be countable; consider using: 'few amounts'.
Suggestion: few amounts
...iature telescope insert into the eye. A few amount of patients has applied to testing the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.269736842105 0.229887763892 117% => OK
Verbs: 0.144736842105 0.158761421928 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.105263157895 0.0866891130778 121% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0723684210526 0.046263068375 156% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0197368421053 0.0685040099705 29% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.111842105263 0.118717715034 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0460526315789 0.0351676179071 131% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.68134703341 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0394736842105 0.0309702414327 127% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.151315789474 0.0887237588012 171% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00657894736842 0.0209618222197 31% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0131578947368 0.0139019557991 95% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 876.0 2387.08602151 37% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 144.0 408.028673835 35% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.08333333333 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.46410161514 4.48200974243 77% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.381944444444 0.338922669872 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.277777777778 0.251872472559 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.1875 0.174417080927 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.131944444444 0.112833075102 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68134703341 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 212.727598566 48% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.715277777778 0.524397521467 136% => OK
Word variations: 76.1678252027 59.2087087015 129% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 20.6684587814 29% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5533526081 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3465891976 48.84282405 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.0 120.699889404 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.5533526081 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.644075263715 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.5376344086 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 51.7777777778 45.7405998639 113% => OK
Elegance: 1.80555555556 1.45489161554 124% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17066870287 0.300154397459 57% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.1631260989 0.103427244359 158% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.109149002197 0.0752933317313 145% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.740584366969 0.497263757937 149% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.201495376525 0.151897553556 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921570496705 0.114077575197 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380814058091 0.0781384742642 49% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.177809881776 0.336927656856 53% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.111818690696 0.067059652881 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960783785812 0.210909579961 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588315602252 0.0618886996521 95% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8870967742 25% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 8.42114695341 36% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 13.6433691756 44% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.