Should a factory be built in your community?
Importance of a factory to each community has been an appealing topic worldwide. Whether it is excellent to build a factory in one’s hometown seems to be a difficult question and different people possess different reasons for their different choices. Personally, I hold my strong belief in the essence of building a factory in my home village.
In the first place, what I put in my priority is personal enjoyment. It cannot be denied that a factory requires considerable workers including engineers, manual workers, etc. Hence, undoubtedly, numerous local people are likely to be employed. Unlike working as a farmer or a building worker, being a factory worker, people are certain to have stable incomes. As long as an individual has a acceptable earning, he or she self-satisfies. More importantly, a factory is variably a place equipped by modern machines and provided with production line. As a result, it is an ideal destination for indigenous students who are interested in discovering more about science. That is surely where they can apply their knowledge and learn new practical things about physics, chemistry or even mathematics. This would possibly bring them the feeling of excitement. By and large, a factory is not merely a place with inanimate boring machines and products. It is really a source of happiness for inhabitants.
On the other hand, some people might say that buiding a factory means that abundance of pollutants are bound to be generated. Accordingly, the environment of the area is sure to be badly damaged. However, it is not necessarily the case. It is widely known that there are several policies of the Government which strictly restricts the amount of emissions thrown to the environment. Furthermore, the circumstance that pollutants would be generated from the factory certainly raises a big question for each local individual: how to preserve our environment? This thinking, without contrary, will encourage everyone to think of the ways to solve the problem. In such a case, excellent solutions certainly emerges. They not only fully help to protect local environment but also better it. Indeed, the opinions that factory is a source of pollution are highly likely to end in collapse.
In conclusion, these mentioned arguments are convincing reasons for my choice. Government worldwide should carefully consider my writing to make appropriate decisions.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Twenty years from now, students will no longer use printed books. 76
- In many countries, more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food producedlocally. Why people buy imported food? What could be done to encourage people to buy local food? 73
- Corruption 73
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers, whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children. Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e incomes. As long as an individual has a acceptable earning, he or she self-sati...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, really, so, in conclusion, as a result, by and large, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29242819843 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04488797377 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595300261097 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4228761146 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.08 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.32 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223431273779 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049688168796 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052375356148 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118678481839 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438255014397 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.