Should the government focus more on preserving natural environment and less on economic development?
Conflicts will arise whenever official decisions are to be made regarding the environment and the economy. Both of them are closely interrelated with the fundamental interests of mankind. Should the government allow the slowdown of economic development by focusing mainly on natural perseveration? Or should emphasis be laid upon the rapid advancement of economy at the cost of a deteriorated environment? As far as I am concerned, neither of these issues can afford to be neglected. It is the inescapable obligation on the part of the government to ensure the sustainable development of both nature and economy.
To begin with, as the foundation of society, economy is of top priority in all nations. The thriving of a country depends on its economic conditions. Today, globalization has already produced chain effects in economy, whose impacts have gone beyond national boundaries from one nation to another. Undoubtedly, the neglect of economic development will bring people back to poverty and hunger. To maintain a smooth and healthy economic development, government is a major force. There is no excuse for a government to shun the responsibility of helping to further develop their country's national economy. Take China as an example. The economic reforms and the opening-up policy adopted last century benefited the nation and its people as a whole. Nowadays, more preferential policies are being formed and implemented, which further testifies to the powerful role of the government in economic development.
Likewise, environmental preservation is also of vital importance. In reality, the unprecedented environmental problems are closely associated with economic and scientific advancement, thus demanding attention from the government. To illustrate, among these issues, the most noticeable ones include air and water pollution caused by industrial waste, global warming, acid rain, land depletion, rainforest destruction as well as the excessive consumption of natural resources. Undeniably, no individual is capable of handling all these disasters without tremendous official support. It is the government's responsibility to implement effective policies and take immediate measures to combat these hazards. Moreover, efforts should also be made to increase the awareness of the public to participate in these activities to preserve the environment and avoid further problems.
In effect, it is sustainable development that is crucial in saving modern society from the torturing conflicts between economy and nature. That is to say, whenever an economic decision is to be made, related environmental concerns ought to be taken into consideration, so that a plan can be verified with the purpose of preventing potential threats. For example, if some resources are planned to be used for human needs, research should be conducted in advance on the current storage of these resources. If these resources are not sustainable, alternative resources must be found instead.
In spite of diversified economic situations around the globe, sustainable development constitutes the common goal shared by both developed countries and developing countries. Attention should be focused on establishing healthy and harmonious systems that reduce the chance of potential economic and ecological crisis. Thus, if the economy is to prosper further then the environment is also to become friendlier than ever.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-09 | fufu | 88 | view |
| 2018-03-12 | bearguodeguang | 90 | view |
- Are some scientists responsible for the negative impacts made by their discoveries 97
- Land: for human needs or for endangered animals? 70
- Should the government focus more on preserving natural environment and less on economic development? 90
- What can help you to succeed 81
- The most important things for governments to do to improve health care 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 592, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... tremendous official support. It is the governments responsibility to implement effective p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, moreover, regarding, so, then, thus, well, for example, as well as, in spite of, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 34.0 8.0752688172 421% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2903.0 1977.66487455 147% => OK
No of words: 512.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.669921875 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21135506618 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55859375 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 946.8 618.680645161 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9357775951 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.678571429 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312670041207 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768584849267 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870886546517 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173180316588 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798153299583 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 58.1214874552 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 10.9000537634 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.01818996416 125% => OK
difficult_words: 178.0 86.8835125448 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.