Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation?
With the increase of world population traffic problems on roads increased exponentially. Governments try to seek solutions for this problem to make people’s life easier. Some experts think that more money should be spent on improving roads and highways; others believe that finances should be allocated for improving public transportation. Without a doubt, amending public transportation is the best approach.
First of all, changing or improving public transportation system will lead to changing people’s everyday life fundamentally. They will be able to manage their time more precisely and save additional expensive minutes. Take for instance my parents. Years ago, we did not have subway station adjacent to our house. It raised a lot of problems: they had to wake up too early, because they would be late for work; sometimes they were annoyed because of all road problems, such as traffic jams; and they were exhausted to get home late. However, when subway station was ready it took up a lot of burdens from my parents. There were far fewer traffic issues and they were able to easily get to workplace both by car and subway. Hence, they could spend more quality time with family and friends.
Furthermore, it is obviously will allow residents to feel convenient. All road issues like early mornings and late nights will result variety of problems such as stress or anxiety. Like my parents, many people experience this kind of problems every day. Moreover, this can influence people’s productivity in workplace. Recently, I read in local newspaper an article about residents’ quality of life before and after building subway station and adding bus lines. Statistics shows that amendments in public transportation fundamentally change people’s everyday life to the best. They became to work with more productivity and zeal, easily reached they career heyday. In conjunction with efficiency people in my town started to involve in volunteering works more frequently which reflects their fierce loyalty to their hometown. This all was the consequence of the stress’s lack which people used to experience in the past.
In conclusion, roads and highways can be in excellent conditions but that will not prevent all the issues people experience because of poor public transportation system. The absence of comfort among people should be essential for government. In addition, amendments in infrastructures like public transportation will be seen in residents’ changing behavior, productivity, and happiness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 632, Rule ID: FEWER_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'less traffic'?
Suggestion: less traffic
...burdens from my parents. There were far fewer traffic issues and they were able to easily get...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41370558376 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98321832751 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568527918782 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2844074761 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.875 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4166666667 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45833333333 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212823195991 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517810915788 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740158579682 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144843451759 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103719977512 0.0645574589148 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.