While the are many benefits of improving of the public transport like buses or trains, however, considering the current scenario in a developing country like India, government should rather, focus on building better roads and highways. There are several reasons that support my position as mentioned in the essay below.
The bus and railway projects are highly convluted and require high amount of investment both in terms of time and money. Such projects may require government to improve the current condition of trains, construct railway lines or in some cases, procure new trains from other countries (like Japan, in the case of Delhi metro). Moreover, it involves a lot of administration work like approvals from different departments, state governments or agencies. As more people are involved, chances of malpractises such as corruption are increased. As a result, these projects are delayed and not much improvement is done at the ground level.
On the other hand, improving roads and highways are much simpler and can be completed within a short duration of time and that too at a lower cost. As the process of constructing and maintaining roads is easier and does not involve many parameters, the government can allocate it to the local contractors and instead, can focus on more pressing issues related to economy, health and education. Building roads have long term benefits - local farmers from nearby villages can come to cities to sell their vegetation and fruits, companies can open offices and factories in villages due to cheap land and good the road connectivity. Allocating the work to the local contrators would lead to more transperency within the goverment and cases of corruption would also decrease.
In conclusion, building roads and highways is more advantageous to the government and public than imporving public transportation.
- Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 76
- It has recently been announced that a new movie theater may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 76
- In the future, students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television or of studying at traditional schools. Which would you prefer? Use reasons and specific details to explain your choice. 90
- A person you know is planning to move to your town or city. What do you think this person would like and dislike about living in your town or city? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 3
- TPO 31_ Independent--Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
While the are many benefits of improving of the publi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...and education. Building roads have long term benefits - local farmers from nearby vi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 43.0788530466 16% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 296.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28040540541 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88003792735 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577702702703 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5736243624 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.25 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.45110844103 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255026667965 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827619091769 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600636836142 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163156896323 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558486685941 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.