should we build a research business center or agriculture one
Nowadays the demand for economic growth is higher than ever. Some people believe that building a research center for agriculture is better than opening a research center for business. This essay will explain why in fact it is important that people focus on the development of the business by opening a research center.
Contrary to the belief that agriculture is a field that people need to explore further, evidence has shown that businesses must develop new strategies in order to continue and extend their success in our country. Since the businesses are an important part of our economy, researchers should come up with new methods that will guarantee their continuous success. For example, statistics have revealed that 90 percent of our revenues are based on the most successful businesses. Consequently, by opening new research center for businesses would allow companies to have enough space and people to study and innovate strategies, which would help to work on this matter. This supports the idea that we would benefit more if we extend our knowledge about how to operate our businesses.
In addition, we must consider that the creation of a new research center would help people with new job opportunities, which means more people would get hired. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Ten years ago, I worked for a big company where I was very happy because they had extra perks for their employees. Also, I quickly advanced in my career while I worked hard to succeed. The company was growing fast and they wanted to open a research business center. When I heard that I was excited because I wanted to suggest them to hire my friend. She was a researcher. So, building new centers opens up new jobs opportunity for people. That is why, I believe that it is very important that we continue to do research to find new methods to develop our economy and change people’s lives by offering new jobs.
In conclusion, in my view, we should build a new research center for business in order to develop our economy by opening new jobs, and discover new methods to improve our businesses further.
- TPO-27. The Little Ice Age. 78
- The author states about the three kinds of damages caused by the " let it burn" policy. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter- argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these damages do not seem convincing.First and foremost, the writer mentions that t 60
- TPO 26 integrated writing task 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 24- integrated writing task 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 580, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld allow companies to have enough space and people to study and innovate strateg...
^^
Line 9, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... very happy because they had extra perks for their employees. Also, I quickly adv...
^^
Line 9, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir employees. Also, I quickly advanced in my career while I worked hard to succ...
^^
Line 13, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lop our economy by opening new jobs, and discover new methods to improve our busi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95290858726 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67471857277 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504155124654 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6401714883 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0555555556 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295972167109 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949369762692 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961523180331 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224782443788 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554385962137 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.