Some adults believe that nowadays children’s behavior is worse than children’s behavior was in the past. These adults have suggested three actions that parents can do to help children ages 5-10 behave better (for example by speaking more respectfully to adults or acting more kindly toward others). Which one action that parents can do might have the most positive effect on their children’s behavior? Why?
-limiting the types of television programs and movies their children can watch.
- spending more time talking with their children.
- supervising or monitoring more closely what their children do when they play with their friends.
Nowadays children show much more negative and bad behaviors than the past children. It is obvious that it undoubtedly stems from some adverse behaviors of parents in communicating with them. There are some sample works that could be effective to help children to behave better and turn into logical individuals. In the first way, parents should be stricter about their children’ watching television programs and movies, another action that would be advantageous work by parents is talking much more time with their children, and third activity is involving with children's games and playing inside and outside of their room. If I found myself in a position to choose between the three of these options, I would definitely go for second action. In what follows I will cogently pinpoint some conspicuous reasons to verify my point of view.
First of all, it is important to consider fraternity between children and parents is the main result of this action. In fact, when children and their parents spend a lot of time with each other and speak about experiences and reminiscences of parents and favorites of children, it is one of the advantages of this action. To illustrate that idea, let's consider the following example. I remember my nephew, who was living with her grandparents six days of week due to his parents' jobs. He had some bad behaviors like screaming, crying without any pretext, hitting other people and so on. His parents after meeting a consulting understood that these negative behaviors are reaction of being far away from his parents. After a while that he spent much more time in his room with his parents and spoke with them he deserted those bad behaviors.
Another significant point to be mentioned is that talking is the best way by which children are able to learn positive and decent behaviors and get more information about adverse influences of habits and traits that are rude and negative. Indeed, children certainly have not enough information about effects of these bad and negative manners, therefore their parents are playing the most pivotal role in children learning process, which talking and speaking is the main part of it. The results of a study conducted in my country indicate that roughly ninety percent of children, who their parents talk with them more than three hours, have shown lesser negative behaviors rather than children who their parents speak lower than one hour.
Finally, in most cases children would like to imitate and behave like their parents and speaking and communicating much time is the most effective strategy to satisfy this children' sentiment through learning positive habits and behaviors with talking with them. When I recollect my childhood period, because my father had passed away when I was three and my mom was very busy to get money, I had not this great chance to speak with them and it turned into my weakness and liability. Today, I feel my some negative behaviors like getting angry quickly is one of the bad effects of that deficiency.
By way of conclusion, based on the arguments explored above, I am of the opinion that in most cases spending more time with parents and talking with them is the most effective way that helps children to be more placid and abandon many bad habits and behaviors. All aforementioned reasons point to my idea. However, a significant issue that must be mentioned is that this cannot be used as a prescription for everybody and some counterexample might exist.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-15 | Farahmad | 70 | view |
| 2020-05-17 | ArashAlirezaei | 66 | view |
| 2020-02-06 | smart1992 | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-06 | smart1992 | 73 | view |
| 2017-10-23 | khanghahi17665 | 91 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The food we ate inthe past was healthier than the food we eat today.Which one of the following would you change to improve your health: 1. The kind of food you eat 2. The amount of exercise 3. The amo 70
- Some young people are free in the evenings or have days off at school, which way can bring them the most benefit?1. To accumulate work experience by a part-time job or volunteering in a community2. Learning to play a sport3. Learning to play a musical ins 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children rely too much on the technology like computers smart phones video games for fun and entertainment Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children s developmen 91
- Imagine that you plan to donate money to charity to help people in need. If you could give money toonly one type of charitable organization, which one of the following would you choose and why?- An organization that provides food and housing to people in 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 550, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...with their children, and third activity is involving with childrens games and playing inside...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, while, i feel, in fact, first of all, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 13.8261648746 217% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 43.0788530466 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 52.1666666667 167% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2906.0 1977.66487455 147% => OK
No of words: 583.0 407.700716846 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9845626072 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91379618374 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62587989299 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457975986278 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 889.2 618.680645161 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.4786516805 48.9658058833 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.090909091 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3157948034 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10300725333 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800034411826 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196318157744 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866765627794 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.