Some believe that one should spend more time being far away from the people we care about, because it is necessary for people to understand the importance of relationship of people we care about, while others think being away from people we care about can damage our relationships with them. Which one do you agree with? Why?
Throughout the history, civilizations have been founded based on human relationships. While these communications have undergone massive changes over time, they are accounted as of the utmost important to each community. The attitude toward this term is varied so that a plethora of people is in the conviction that they should keep their distance from their dears to remind them the importance of their relationships. Contrary to this popular belief, there are those who argue that keeping distance may threaten to undermine the relations. I am of the opinion that people should do their best in order to preserve their friendships.
First of all, rapid changes and complexity of today's world present new challenges and put new demands on the people. Admittedly, the growing segment of people become more involved in their routine activities every day, and they do not have time to spend with their friends. Nowadays, the more people get engaged in their life, the less they pay attention to their relations, and it becomes the matter of concerns for many sociologists that people become less and less in contact with each other. Subsequently, people are already far apart from each other, and keeping this distance deliberately, will not be a sensible choice. Furthermore, technology is another implication of modern societies that restrict human relationship; so it seems that being far away in order to urge others to appreciate the relations, not only do not solve the main problem but also worsen the situation. Imagine a circumstance that a person has decided to step back, while his friend is not aware of his purpose. As a result, the other side keeps the right to break the relation or less in touch. That is why the intentional consequences are often inevitable.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that people establish various kinds of relationships with each other, and most of them are not comparative. In fact, it is the acceptable principle in human science that says: "The human is unpredictable." This statement approves that there is not a particular rule for the relationships; therefore we cannot generalize that being far away from other make them to value their relationships. Moreover, friendship is for hard times. If it is supposed that friends abandon each other due to different reasons, this word loses its meaning. Undoubtedly, each tie has two sides which have the mutual connection with each other, and it should be balanced. Although, if someone thinks that she has imposed most of the load of the relation, they can clear the issue instead of going away and leaving her friend with the hope that he feels regret and retrieves their relationship.
On the basis of the points mentioned above, I am convinced that social communication plays a crucial role in this era of time, so people should try to spend enough time with others. Besides, people can manage their distance according to their relationships with other and keeping distance to change their mind is not a wise option.
- TPO42 83
- TPO14 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who have learned many different skills are more likely to succeed than those who focus on learning only one skill. 90
- TPO 12 - Jane Austen Portrait 80
- Do you agree or disagree? Rather than help children with their schoolwork, parents should encourage their children do their work independently 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 929, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... hope that he feels regret and retrieves their relationship. On the basis of t...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'apart from', 'in fact', 'as a result', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.210338680927 0.229887763892 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.16577540107 0.158761421928 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0873440285205 0.0866891130778 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0588235294118 0.046263068375 127% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0641711229947 0.0685040099705 94% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126559714795 0.118717715034 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0392156862745 0.0351676179071 112% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.898057419 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0285204991087 0.0309702414327 92% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.101604278075 0.0887237588012 115% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.017825311943 0.0209618222197 85% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0106951871658 0.0139019557991 77% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3064.0 2387.08602151 128% => OK
No of words: 503.0 408.028673835 123% => OK
Chars per words: 6.09145129225 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48200974243 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.339960238569 0.338922669872 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.252485089463 0.251872472559 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.176938369781 0.174417080927 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.131212723658 0.112833075102 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.898057419 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528827037773 0.524397521467 101% => OK
Word variations: 63.7976563634 59.2087087015 108% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.9523809524 20.5533526081 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5344818621 48.84282405 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.904761905 120.699889404 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9523809524 20.5533526081 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 0.644075263715 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 49.2008898987 45.7405998639 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.3024691358 1.45489161554 90% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332013339243 0.300154397459 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0975527913532 0.103427244359 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0573904687587 0.0752933317313 76% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.475865497971 0.497263757937 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.151780620923 0.151897553556 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122116124582 0.114077575197 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592020601033 0.0781384742642 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.461807455473 0.336927656856 137% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0954720899126 0.067059652881 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245026865413 0.210909579961 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287546742843 0.0618886996521 46% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.42114695341 131% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.6433691756 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.