Some companies decided not to allow employees to discuss business by sending mails or messages on weekends Some people believe that this policy is great Others believe that this policy will discourage employees What is your opinion and why

Essay topics:

Some companies decided not to allow employees to discuss business by sending mails or messages on weekends. Some people believe that this policy is great. Others believe that this policy will discourage employees. What is your opinion and why?

Some people think that permitting workers to talk about businesses by sending messages on weekends is a fabulous idea, while others disagree. For me, I fully agree that companies should not allow employees to discuss any work-related issues on non-weekdays. My reasons are as follows.

To begin with, companies should focus on employees’ mental health, and disallowing them to discuss work during the weekends helps them become less stressed. For instance, my brother’s company tells him to relax and have fun on weekends. My brother often brings his family to the mountains and observes adorable animals running in the woods. Sometimes, he asks his friends out and enjoys delicacies in fancy restaurants during the weekends. All of these activities help him restore his mood and refresh his mind. Therefore, he does not feel under a lot of pressure whenever he returns to work. On the other hand, my friend Todd is a web designer, but his managers force him to do work on Saturday. Todd told me that he constantly feels tired and exhausted every day because he could not get enough sleep on weekends. A few months later, he got insomnia and depression, and he even sued his company for damaging his mental status. Letting workers have a rest can prevent them from getting mental issues.

In addition, companies usually focus on workers’ efficiency, and forbidding them to talk about their work on weekends boosts employees’ efficiency to a great extent. Take my cousin’s company as an example. My cousin’s IT company disallowed engineers to access workstations from home on weekends. Simultaneously, his supervisors frequently require programmers to hand in their tasks within a single week. As a result, engineers in his company have no choice but to work harder during the weekdays. Eventually, most people can complete each of their programming missions in less than 12 days. On the contrary, my sister’s IT company permitted their employees to access computers in the company on Sunday. Most workers mess around during the weekdays because they know that they can work from home during the weekend. As a result, even though employees work more hours per week, the overall efficiency drops significantly due to procrastination on weekdays. To be more specific, her colleagues often finish writing a small piece of front-end HTML code using more than two weeks. Dissuading employees to work on the weekends through policies allows workers to increase efficiency.

In conclusion, I maintain that companies should not permit workers to discuss businesses via messages or emails during the weekend. After all, companies should emphasize workers’ efficiency and mental health. Of course, there are some benefits to working non-weekdays. Nevertheless, I believe that my reasons are more persuasive.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-04-17 wxr031 83 view
2022-03-13 wxr031 88 view
2022-03-13 wxr031 88 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user wxr031 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...s company as an example. My cousin’s IT company disallowed engineers to access workstat...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 624, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...2 days. On the contrary, my sister’s IT company permitted their employees to access com...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, after all, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, of course, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand, to a great extent

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2374.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27555555556 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89179341167 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553333333333 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2005038622 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7857142857 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0714285714 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17371517673 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484776711242 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567373259773 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13684031678 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658057301438 0.0645574589148 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.