Some parents cannot stay at home full time to care for young children of preschool age. Some of these parents have the choice of sending their young children either to a childcare center, where many children will be together, or to an individual caregiver, where the child will be the only one being cared for. Which approach do you think is better for a young child, and why?
Nowadays, children of preschool age(of about one to five) have access to a childcare center with many companions or an individual caregiver with one-for-one service. Although some parents tend to hold that sending their kids to the center is a better approach to take the place of them when they are working, from my perspective, one-for-one cultivation service is more suitable for the children.
To begin with, children can better keep healthy under the help of individual caregivers. This is because the caregivers can better take care of children, helping them avoid being infected by diseases borne by other children. This is especially helpful when there is an epidemic period, which happens in every interval between seasons. If the children usually vulnerable to sickness are not looked after well, they are more likely to have flu, which may further damage their incomplete immune systems. On the contrary, the educator giving care to one child can instantaneously oversee this child’s physical condition, taking the effective solution to nip the illness in the bud if the child is somewhat uncomfortable.
In addition, children can be better-trained when they acquire the intensive care in the individual caregivers. In general, individual caregivers can obviously provide a better environment where children can focus on acquiring knowledge rather than be distracted by other peers in the care centers who may possess bad habits cultivated by the poor family education. In this way, children’s good habits can be better developed, which may be of great essence to their future schooling acquisition. For instance, babies in the caregivers can pay more attention to what their tutors are talking and acting. In contrast, babies in the care centers are prone to being disrupted by the mischievous counterparts while they are listening to their teachers. Once they are distracted, hardly can they get back to their learning, which may harm their concentration.
Granted, some opponents may argue that children in care centers can foster their sense of cooperation for they are more often than not required to cooperate with others. However, seeing this situation from another respect, we may find that these children tend to quarrel with each other over the same toy due to the fact that they are more selfish in the preschool years.
In a nutshell, according to what has been discussed above, my firm conviction is that an individual caregiver can be a better solution to the parents’ thorny issues of parenting due to the hustle and bustle of work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-10 | Frank Chen | 83 | view |
- Fossil fuels(e.g. coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources of energy in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Is it a positive or negative effect? 56
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes(in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 84
- These days children spend more time on doing homework or participating in school-related activities or sports. However, they should be given more time to do whatever they want. 81
- The pie chart below show reasons why people left the UK for other countries and why people stayed in the UK. 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ultivated by the poor family education. In this way, children's good habits c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in contrast, in general, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2162.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22222222222 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87205279384 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533816425121 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.2020915899 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.125 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29772745297 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108345343068 0.076458572812 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557600672266 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173607356881 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432058202543 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.