Nowadays, some parents motivate their children to study hard with some kind of award, such as a financial award. Some people assert it is a good idea, whereas others oppose this point of view. In my opinion, a financial award is an effective way to lash children to study hard and get a good grade, especially with the following reasons taken into consideration.
To begin with, it is a feasible way for parents to motivate their children to pay attention to study. Children need to be encouraged when they succeed or make huge progress, and money can be the role of encouragement. For example, when I was a pupil in elementary school, my parents told me that if I got a high rank in the monthly or final exam, I could be awarded 20 yuan for it. I was so excited about it because I thought it was a large amount of money and I can obtain it simply through an exam! Thus, before every test or exam, I worked hard until night, obliteratedly preparing for the incoming test. I looked through every question and checked every answer carefully before handing the paper in. In this way, I earned a lot of money, and at the same time, I got a higher grade. As a result, I believe that this way is effective and helpful.
Moreover, it can cultivate a good habit of saving and planning money for children. By behaving well in exams, children can get a certain amount of money and this is a perfect time for children to learn how to arrange their deposit. According to the Times magazine, people who start to monitor their money in the early stage of their life are more likely to succeed in the future.
Admittedly, some may point out that it is bad for children to bond money with grades, and children could lie about their grades to earn more money. However, I do not think that the cheating behavior is the result of a wrong award. Instead, it is the absence of education on honesty. Parents should teach their children how to be honest.
In conclusion, offering children money as the reward for a good grade is an effective way to motivate them for parents, in my opinion.
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows T 75
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks so they called the 60
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- In 1995 a microscopic fungus called Phytophthora ramorum or P ramorum was first detected in the forests of the western United States P ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees in many infected oaks leaves wither rapidly la 81
- Did bees a type of insect exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests The structures have been found inside 200 million year old fossilized trees in the 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, moreover, so, thus, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48812664908 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49941479217 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514511873351 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1970992186 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0555555556 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319871447486 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970516099526 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501954663826 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181941900122 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122544701639 0.0645574589148 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.