Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The human has a vital role in damage or building earth a better place, the numerous examples supported with human activities makes the earth a better place to live. The earth is worshiped as a goddess in many cultures and people also do a lot to help earth from damages. There are several reasons which support the idea that people do different activities to save earth and its environment.
First, natural disasters are very harmful and destroy the land affected from it. Flood, drought, wildfire, earthquake, volcano eruption are some examples of natural disasters which affect on a large scale. Humans help the land to decrease the effect of disaster such as recent wildfires in California forests due to lightning. Firefighters tried to stop the spreading of fire so that wildlife and trees can be preserved from calamity.
Second, the researchers of zoology work for preserving natural habitats, protection of endangered species and manage wildlife’s adjustment to ever changing climate. For instance, the tiger was an endangered species but people preserve tigers and now it comes to optimum numbers. There are several species to which people helped to adjust with changing environmental conditions.
Third, we help the earth in replenishing the natural resources to maintain the balance in nature. Today we have different technologies and machinery which is helpful to cultivate the barren land of the earth or to embellish the earth. Humans also invented techniques to use renewable sources of energy in such a way that earth can not be harmed such as solar energy.
Conclusively, there are few examples which illustrate that human activity helps the earth to become better. There are different scientists who study earth and related fields with the purpose that humans could not damage earth.
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine."A recent study rating 300 male and female Mention advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sl 25
- The following appeared in a health newsletter."A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that 49
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should sometimes do things that they do not enjoy doing Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 67
- In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain you 58
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the planning department of the city of Transopolis."Ten years ago, as part of a comprehensive urban renewal program, the city of Transopolis adapted for industrial use a large area of severely substanda 29
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es to save earth and its environment. First, natural disasters are very harmfu...
^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ome examples of natural disasters which affect on a large scale. Humans help the land to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, third, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 43.0788530466 23% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 291.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24054982818 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72192282289 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567010309278 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.5979350089 48.9658058833 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340871115547 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115190685956 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119329993865 0.0737576698707 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196222127216 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14867439937 0.0645574589148 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.