Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Recently there has been a ton of debates on whether human activity has detrimental effects on earth. Personally, I am of the opinion that human activities indeed have damaged the earth. I feel this way because of two reasons, which I will explore in this essay.
First of all, pollution resulted from human activities have harmed the earth severely. Currently, different kinds of pollution such as air pollution, plastic pollution and water pollution, have drawn attention from environmental conservation organizations all over the world and been proved to be hazardous to the environment. For example, results observed from worldwide studies have clearly shown that air pollution, which is caused mainly by waste gas released from vehicles, including carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide and nitric oxide, has warmed the earth and resulted in extreme climate change, consequently leading to increased sea level and natural disasters such as tsunami and Hurricanes, which represents typical consequences from disturbed climate. This evidently demonstrates that human activity has damaged the earth.
Secondly, deforestation also have destroyed the ecosystems on earth. Clearing and cutting down trees has put a large number of animals in danger because of lacking dwelling places, and reduced suitable land for human beings as well because of desertification. This is best demonstrated by a research conducted by Peking University. Results from this study show that the area of desert in China has increase by 10 percent in the last few decades, and tens of thousands of animals have been forced to leave their habitats. As we can see, human activities have brought about tremendous damage to the earth.
In conclusion, I am fully convinced that human activities have put the earth including themselves in danger. This is because human nowadays has polluted almost every non-renewable resource on earth, and because deforestation has damaged plenty of dwelling places for both human and animals.
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of so 76
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world From the fossil remains we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods relatives of modern day 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...Clearing and cutting down trees has put a large number of animals in danger because of lacking dw...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, i feel, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 309.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47572815534 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8983613523 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57928802589 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 97.1247094393 48.9658058833 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.857142857 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246958622307 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122812459832 0.076458572812 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104313684564 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18384974899 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568248941721 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.