The way that people treat and do is distinctive. Some people follow the traditional way to deal with everything, while others tend to follow personal preference. As for me, I believe that following what you prefer is much more important.
First of all, it is more vital to follow personal preference because it can make people put more effort and enjoy in the works. For example, when I did the scientific report, my senior always told me to follow her method to make an excellent report to get better grades. However, I refused to follow her way and utilized my own strategy to handle the whole project instead. Because everything was followed in my own way, I enjoyed searching data, conducting experiments, and even doing tens of thousands of paper works. Finally, I complete the report with joy and an enjoyable feeling. Thus, I really put more effort into my work enjoyably by making things followed my own method.
Secondly, people who tend to handle things in their way can create more opportunities for success. Take my friend, David, for example; when David avoided following the family tradition to study medicine, he focused on art in which he was talented. With his inborn talent, he won a lot of competition and even got an opportunity to study abroad. It was his insistence that he abandoned the traditional way to become a doctor and discovered the realm he really good at to show his outstanding art performance in the world. Therefore, David really followed his personal preference subject, art, to become an unprecedented artist in the world.
Thirdly, following the traditional way sometimes is not suitable in contemporary society. For instance, when my friend, Amy, teamed up with me to prepare the final presentation, she insisted to used traditional paperwork to prepare the slides. Due to her continuous insistence, we printed all the information and cut them to make the slides, thus making us spend 2 weeks finishing the slide-making task. Additionally, Amy refused to scan it to transform the paperwork into the electronic PowerPoint file to present. She even printed 30 copies for each of the students rather than showing the slides via the projector. Finally, the professor evaluated this ridiculous presentation to a failing score. Hence, the traditional presentation form not only let us spend an extremely large time preparing but it was also obsolete to express.
In conclusion, I hold the profound conviction that following personal preference is more crucial. After all, not only can it make people place more emphasis on handling things but it can also create more opportunities to succeed.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People in the future will read fewer books 82
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to have rules about the types of clothes that people wear in their workplace and at school 76
- the koalas population 81
- If you are a teacher and is going to do a project with two students which of the following method would you choose a instruct them separately and divide the projects into three parts so you only have to do your own part b finish all parts of the project w 76
- Agree or disagree students are more interested in politics than they were in the past 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, while, after all, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2206.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07126436782 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89534366342 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537931034483 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3250535388 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9130434783 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9130434783 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26086956522 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193845873692 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597398606176 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552108637434 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122548574187 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826832663993 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.