Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to schoolwork, which of the two approaches do you prefer?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, hectic life with swiftly advancing technology stipulates people to engage in their work for most of their day. As a result, they do not have much time to dedicate to their family, which in turn requires specific time management and prioritizing affairs. In this vein, some people believe that the best way to utilize the time they spent with their children is to indulge in entertainment activities, while the other group holds the opposite view, thinking that the best approach is to put that time into school chores. I, personally, concur with the former group for two main reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
The first and foremost reason for the above-mentioned concept is that having fun with all family members energizes the whole family and prepares them for their work, resulting in elevating their performance and efficiency. To be more specific, the family members usually have arduous duties, which need a plethora amount of energy. If the family has fun together, they can all relax and make some joyful memories, bonding family members together. This sense of satisfaction eventually works out and motivates family members to make progress in their work, specifically in school kids. On the other hand, if they just talk with each other about concerns and stresses of their affairs, this brings a negative feeling, which separates the family. An example can make this complex context clearer. My parents both work in a pharmaceutical company. I have a younger sister, who is a high school student. In their leisure, my sister shares some of her beloved works with my parents. They either go out and enjoy roaming the city or stay at home and do fun things like watching movies. In this way, my sister rests and frees her mind of school thoughts. I never saw her become stressed about homework or the upcoming tests, which has helped her gain perfect scores and pass her courses with the highest quality. I believe that if my parents exerted conversely and did school-associated tasks together all the time, my sister would have been too tired of school and had a decline in her efficiency.
The second reason for the aforementioned notion is that maybe the parents are not qualified to help their children with their school tasks, which puts a huge burden on their shoulders and enhances their worries. Indeed, the educational system today is so different from what it was in our previous generation’s era. Recently, advances in science have created a gap between what parents learned in school and what their children are studying today. Accordingly, parents may not be successful to teach the principles to their children, which in turn makes them feel ashamed. There is no need to explain that implementing in this way benefits neither parents nor their children. I take my friend as an example to clarify this issue. When I went to high school, I had a friend, Sara, whose parents finished high school 30 years ago and didn’t go to the university afterward. Sara always used to complain about her parents not being useful in helping her understand her lessons. Besides, when I saw Sara’s mother, she was always embarrassed that she is not capable of facilitating the perception of our lessons for her daughter. She was convinced that the best she can do as a good parent for her daughter is dedicating all her free time to Sara’s assignments, even though her efforts not be effective. Back then, I always speculated that if her parents had allocated their free time to have fun with Sara and entrusted educational work to a private teacher earlier, they did not encounter any anxiety.
In sum, when parents devote their extra time to having fun with their kids, they earn some advantages. They not only decrease the pressure of work as well as enhance family members’ output, but also prevent the added stress of taking care of children’s school work due to not being appropriate for teaching.
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own Use specif 80
- TPO49 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you 85
- TPO68 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, conversely, first, if, may, second, so, then, well, while, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 83.0 43.0788530466 193% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3298.0 1977.66487455 167% => OK
No of words: 669.0 407.700716846 164% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92974588939 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.08576781939 4.48103885553 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65462856234 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 341.0 212.727598566 160% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509715994021 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 996.3 618.680645161 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0181965226 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.933333333 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287938156918 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754007664539 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749156213153 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205685551951 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633821174189 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 161.0 86.8835125448 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, conversely, first, if, may, second, so, then, well, while, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 83.0 43.0788530466 193% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3298.0 1977.66487455 167% => OK
No of words: 669.0 407.700716846 164% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92974588939 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.08576781939 4.48103885553 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65462856234 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 341.0 212.727598566 160% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509715994021 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 996.3 618.680645161 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0181965226 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.933333333 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287938156918 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754007664539 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749156213153 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205685551951 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633821174189 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 161.0 86.8835125448 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.