Some people prefer to travel with a companion, other people prefer to travel alone. Which do you prefer ? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers
When people go for a walk, travel, or fly, the most important thing is journey itself rather than the arrival. The more interesting the journey, the more amount of boredom is reduced. Travelling is one of the circumstances that create healthy relationships between people. Travelling with a peer is better than travelling alone because travellers enjoy more and are more secured when they are accompanied.
First, a companion brings extra joy in a journey which will allow both of the travellers to enjoy their trip. There is an African proverb that says, "one bothers, but two have fun." Accompanied, people have the opportunity to crack jokes, talk about things they value, and more importantly learn from one another. All of these factors will make travellers enjoy their journeys. For instance, one day I went to visit one of my friends named Gaelle. She lives 15 kilometers away from my home. At first I felt bored to go there, but when another friend of mine told me he was also going, I felt more energized to go. However, I was still concerned about the distance. As we set off, my friend and I started to discuss our academics. We kept on moving towards Gaelle's house in the meantime. We both loved talking about our classes so much that we did not realize that we were reaching Gaelle's house. To me, it felt like a two minutes walk while we had spent two hours walking. Because I was walking with a friend, I felt energized and enjoyed the trip.
Second, travelling with a friend reinforces one's security. Alone someone may face many problems on his or her way, and nobody will care. That is why having a friend who old one accountable on the way is great. My friend's sister, Sally, was a solitary woman. She defended everybody to accompany her to the bookstore one day. Then, on her way she started having respiratory problems because she suffers asthma. When she fell down nobody on the road could help her, for she could not tell them that she is asthmatic. She suffered the consequence of going alone. Had she have a accountable companion, she would have received appropriate treatement on spot.
In conclusion, travelling with a companion is better because the companion is a potential healer and contributes to one's happiness during his or her journey. With a peer, people barely feel bored because they have the opportunity to talk to someone. Also, companion reinforces one's security due to the fact that companions can act if anything wrong occurs. Due to the numerous advantages they provide, people should travel with companions.
- Many people visit museums when they travel to new places. Why do you think people visit museums? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- What makes personality? 75
- Compare and Contrast Your ways and Your parents Ways 70
- Rewards improve employee's productivity 76
- The Principle of Scientific Management 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...nd, travelling with a friend reinforces ones security. Alone someone may face many p...
^^^^
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[4]
Message: Possible agreement error – use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...the consequence of going alone. Had she have a accountable companion, she would have...
^^^^
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...onsequence of going alone. Had she have a accountable companion, she would have r...
^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s a potential healer and contributes to ones happiness during his or her journey. Wi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 279, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... to someone. Also, companion reinforces ones security due to the fact that companion...
^^^^
Line 4, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., people should travel with companions.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2130.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85193621868 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64912536587 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553530751708 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0022789608 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.4482758621 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1379310345 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.79310344828 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134938730835 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397328771885 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510977996676 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104245746866 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625577511799 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.