Some people prefer to travel to tourist sports with many people. While others prefer less crowded ones. Which do you prefer and why?
Some people consider how many people they should invite their travel to tourist sports. While some people are willing to go somewhere with many people, some prefer less crowded ones. It is so controvertible for them to decide the specific selection for their trip. In my view, people can gain advantages from going everywhere with many people. They can accept their decisions for details of their journeys with others, rely on others if they face accidents, and share their memories in real-time.
To begin with, people can acquire different ideas for their trips to go with others. Some people sometimes perplex their plans for their excursions if they are alone to go abroad. They have to research internets about recommended places by reviews. On the other hand, people collaborate with their fellows for their selections when they travel with their friends. Take myself as an example, I went to Tokyo with my friends for the celebration of our graduation from university. Then, we focused on details about our trips to enjoyable. When I tried by myself, I did not think about my travel seriously. Therefore, we were able to create unforgettable memories of this trip. As a result, people should go to travel with others.
Secondly, relying on others is one of the merits of travels with bountiful people. Generally speaking, people will ask strangers for the directions where they want to go if they lost their ways to their hotel in isolation. They also have to spend their courage in speaking with strangers even if they are not communicative people. Nevertheless, people who traveled with others can earn enough helps from around their friends. Therefore, they are capable of solving their problems such as lost their ways, communication with local people, and rugged their money from someone. Thus, people should select more the trip with others than with fewer people.
Finally, people can refuse their memories in real-time by travel with plenty of people. Some people post their pictures or videos from their trips on social media such as Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook, and so on. It is not the most practical way to share their fascinating memories about their life. The adequate way is to consume their trips in real-time with their friends or families. Hence, they gradually boost their friendships themselves and divide the unforgettable memories with a lot of people.
To sum up, people should devote their trips to many people. I surely believe that they can deeply contemplate about their journeys with their comrades, depend on their fellows while facing difficulties on their trips, and share about their memories from their trips with others.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, hence, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as for, such as, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2240.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10250569476 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5205688164 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476082004556 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 663.3 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1853801164 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.962962963 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2592592593 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200971235119 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863907324451 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939886266028 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144756187545 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825351397712 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.