Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which do you agree with?
Nowadays, accessibility to the internet provides people a lot of valuable information. Although some think that so much information would create problems, in my humble opinion, accessing to plenty of information, as quickly as possible, is necessary due to several reasons.
Firstly, many students challenge with learning the subject in classes, so they seek for online courses. A bunch of these courses offers them to teach difficult topics in a shorter time. In fact, due to the limited teaching ability of some old professor, who didn’t adopt the new environment in the educational system, students need to learn their courses by themselves. For example, during my junior year, one of my professors who gives microbiology lectures is not well-equipped, and none of the other professors are capable of teaching that subject, neither. Thus, I decided to study for the exams at home via the internet, because the lecturer, in the online course, knew how to make complex topics fun and easy for many of us. However, the success correlates with students’ effort. Additionally, since these kinds of courses are available free on the internet, students are happy to be educated quickly without purchasing.
Secondly, plenty of journals, books, and publications are references for many science students, which the internet affords. Scientific researches must refer to acknowledge on the main subject for their studies. Moreover, thanks to the internet, most graduate studies find plenty of resources in a few weeks, sometimes even a few days. The internet, also, allows scientist to publish new findings immediately with the colleagues, who study on the same topic. In my senior year, the group that worked with had journal clubs which we share new publications of other groups in the field of the ancient period of Anatolia. Like many other groups, our group is keen on to be the first group which publishes the same profound finding with its conclusive evidence. The simultaneous exchange of information, indeed, in the scientific area, it is crucial to secure unnecessary expenses.
Finally, the internet contributes to the progress on the knowledge level of humanity through education and scientific researches. When these reasons, mentioned above, are considered, nobody can blame the internet with creating problems. It, indeed, has a large amount of valuable information for students and scientists.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. Use specific reasons and examples to support your 76
- TPO 20 – task 2: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well. 76
- 41 Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
- 41 Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
- Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant For instance humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37 C no matter whether the environment is warm or cold Because dinosaurs were rep
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, in fact, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2048.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4036939314 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95922729733 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593667546174 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9758634528 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.789473684 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9473684211 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274243909329 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080610366221 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948243873481 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193113923454 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131513936055 0.0645574589148 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.