Some people think because some children find some subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult they ought to be optional instead of compulsory. To what extent do you agree?
Many people believe that students should be able to choose subjects they like rather than studying subjects which they don't like and face difficulties leaning them. Although it is important to have basic standard knowledge of a range of subjects, mugging up the topics of a non-interesting subject may trouble learners and often lead to bad grades. This essay will discuss how an option to choose between subjects is beneficial for children.
It is very important to gain some insights into a different field of study so that young students can choose a subject that they wish to pursue in their University education or build their professional career around it. Giving an option of dropping a subject in early education may lead to problems in the future. It is likely to happen that most children will choose a subject which seems easier to them or choose one by the influence of someone else like a friend or sibling without considering the value of that subject in their ambition. Due to all these reasons, many people stand against the voice of subjects given to young children.
However, if one is dedicated and sure about his/her ambition, giving them subject of their choice will shape the path they want to continue. Having a deep knowledge of one specific field will give them a head start on their professional career. For instance, if a student wants to become a mechanical engineer someday he/she may want to choose subjects like physics, mathematics, engineering drawing, etc. Which will be beneficial for them rather than studying geography and history. Considering all these reasons I believe students should be able to select a curriculum for themselves.
In conclusion, learning different topics might help one in selecting a career whereas, giving choices will enhance the knowledge and skills required for that career. I think students should study a variety of subjects in their early education but once they reach an age where they can select what's good for them, they should be given options.
- Some people think because some children find some subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult they ought to be optional instead of compulsory To what extent do you agree 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- tdhb 3
- Some people think because some children find some subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult they ought to be optional instead of compulsory To what extent do you agree 73
- Some people think that they can make as much noise as they want while others think that the amount of noise people make should be strictly controlled 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ather than studying subjects which they dont like and face difficulties leaning them...
^^^^
Line 4, column 292, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...they reach an age where they can select whats good for them, they should be given opt...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, whereas, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00892857143 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62824244997 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4389511017 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.214285714 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14651004465 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542590357559 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401204236703 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992570925219 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352221326492 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.