Some people think that with the development of technology and the Internet, libraries will disappear, while others think libraries are always necessary. Which opinion do you agree
Although many people say that libraries nowadays seem to be useless, I think that libraries are always necessary. We definitely cannot deny that the Internet has made our lives a lot easier, and it can pretty much replace the libraries. However the internet has a lot of disadvantages, too.
In this modern world the Internet is considered to be one of the most important and useful inventions and is the main source of information. These days, people have the ability to get almost any book or magazine online. In this way people save money and time. They don’t have to go to a library or a bookstore, find a parking spot and then either find the book or not. On the internet you just type in the book’s title and it will show varieties of that book at different prices or even for free. The libraries might as well run out of your desired item, however, on the internet it is the online version of the book and it is always available. So based on all above mentioned we can conclude that the Internet is way more convenient to use than libraries.
However the Internet also has disadvantages. Looking at the screen for a long time can cause health issues such as neck and back problems, headaches, blurred vision and so on. There are also a lot of people who claim that using a printed version is way easier. In addition there are a lot of people who cannot afford using the Internet, so they get books from libraries.
So, taking into consideration all above mentioned we can say that both the Internet and the libraries are very important for our society and it would be very unfair if the libraries disappeared. So, if we don’t want the rate of educated people to reduce we need to maintain our libraries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... can pretty much replace the libraries. However the internet has a lot of disadvantages...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ore convenient to use than libraries. However the Internet also has disadvantages. Lo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ing a printed version is way easier. In addition there are a lot of people who cannot af...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to use'.
Suggestion: to use
...e are a lot of people who cannot afford using the Internet, so they get books from li...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 196, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ry unfair if the libraries disappeared. So, if we don’t want the rate of educated peop...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, then, well, i think, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 310.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56129032258 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56982408691 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522580645161 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1884469583 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.375 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183309073823 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622723759217 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602095393737 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119028590431 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526522993547 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.