Keeping in touch a relationship is important for almost everyone. With this in mind, some people believe that gaps in a relationship have a positive influence, for they can better realize their feeling. However, others, including me, cast doubt on that by claiming that individuals can be in a good relationship only with communicating with each other.
To begin with, the drawbacks of deciding to make a temporary separation in a relationship outweigh the benefits and may pose some irreversible problems in partners’ connection. Since the one who tries to be away from the other in the virtue of realizing his/her own feeling, may demolish the other’s feelings, for he/she may think that it is not a real love. My own experience can be a compelling example of this notion. I was in deep love with a person, and we were in a good relationship with each other. However, he broke up with me to think more about the aim of our relation, regardless of my feeling. It was one of the harsh periods in my life, for I thought he did not love me anymore. Moreover, although he told me that he missed me a lot asked me to get back together, his first decision completely ruined our relation, for, from my perspective, his outlandish behavior was not a forgivable mistake.
Moreover, individuals can better understand either their issues or difference of opinions, only by talking with each other. Being in a good communication not only assists both individuals to evaluate the pros and cons of their partner’s mental behavior, but also brings about a situation that helps them to easily understand whether they have common interests to continue their relationship or not. It can be proved with an example of a situation that partners opt to go to an advisor for their mutual problems. Most of the time, counselors ask them to talk about their issues and viewpoints with each other to either solve the misunderstanding concepts or accept different ideas.
In conclusion, there are several reasons which can be persuasive enough to support that individuals should not make a separation in their relationships, for not only does it harm their relationship, but it also may have negative effects on their knowledge about each other.
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 73
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- Do you agree or disagree？ It is better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book than doing physical exercise. Explain your answer with examples and specific reasons. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally; one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nly with communicating with each other. To begin with, the drawbacks of deciding...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...avior was not a forgivable mistake. Moreover, individuals can better understand eith...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9575596817 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02667746509 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522546419098 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.8682286291 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.6 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1333333333 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27517917128 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984094068062 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645134656983 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169125528215 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058801201917 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.