Some students like classes where teachers lecture (do all the talking) in class. Other students prefer classes where student do some of the talking. Which type of class do you prefer? Give specific reasons and details to support your choice.
There are different type of practices how teachers convey all incumbent academic information to students. It is critically important to be perceived by students in the most auspicious way in order to attain successful outcomes in all exams. It is my firm belief that all students must attend classes where they are involved in conversations and i will develop some explanations in the subsequent paragraphs.
First and foremost, students who are involved in conversations during lectures and classes can develop their communication skills. By stimulating those skills they will find easy leading a team, make a business meeting, presentations or other activities later in their future carrier. Profoundly conversations regarding an academic topic during classes have a positive effects on one's social skills. As a result, students become more confident and their speed of thinking and elaborate on particular subject increases considerably.
What's more is that the lectures are more interesting and successful. No one can deny that being engaged in a conversation can incise your attention and keeps you focused. Moreover, students feel that their voices and thoughts are heard and psychologically makes them feel special. On the other hand, their results of exams are much better and there are evidences. For example, when I was at high-school our geography teacher made a interesting class in which we were engaged. For the purpose we were divided into groups and discussed different parts from a lesson. In fact, one week later we had a test and I scored great points with solely superficial preparation at home.
In conclusion, I wound say that being in a class which students are intensively involved in is preferable due to the positive effect of their social and communication skills. Also they are more intrigued and engaged in the talks.
- Do you agree with the following statement Face to face communication is better than other types of communication such as letter emails or telephones calls Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 83
- If food tastes good it s probably bad for you How far do you agree with this statement Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is time we all relied less on private motor vehicles to get around and instead used other forms of transport Use specific examples and details to support your answer 90
- You have been asked for some suggestions to make your hometown a better place What suggestions would you make and why 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... they are involved in conversations and i will develop some explanations in the s...
^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...cular subject increases considerably. Whats more is that the lectures are more inte...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... high-school our geography teacher made a interesting class in which we were enga...
^
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... their social and communication skills. Also they are more intrigued and engaged in ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 295.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27118644068 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02051588822 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596610169492 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1179466965 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1875 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236082412759 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672819782912 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657361339948 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149073299442 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449522104366 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.