Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Being in a classroom is a very important part of our lives. It is where we the professor could pass his knowledge to students, creating the base of the educational system. Some people would prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions; others would not. In my view, open discussions between the professor and students with almost no discussion is better for two important reasons.
The main reason is that with discussion we can develop further ideas from a subject. A famous cliché claims that inside a school, professors teach students and students teach professor; and it is true. Creating a discussion with students, the professor could enter in deeper subjects brought by his pupils. In that way, the class will become more complete and interesting. For example, when I was in college, I had a professor called Tomas with administered aerodynamics courses. I remember that he never used any type of presentation and barely touched the blackboard. The only thing that Tomas did was telling us the theme and them we started a discussion about the subject. Almost every time someone had an experience or a new information to add and everybody could learn from that. Also, sometimes an entire course was created by the students and the professor just added small correction. As you can see, with the help of a professor, classes with a lot of discussion could be very powerful.
Another reason is that type of learning helps to increase student’s focus and avoid boring lessons. I know many students which complain about monotonous presentations. A lot of times teachers just read the content written in that presentations and I believe that even themselves are not paying attention in what they are reading. For instance, I also remember the course of material’s structures that started after Tomas’ classes. That classes was a three hour course on the last time slot available, from 4 pm to 7 pm. The professor always used a very boring presentation with a lot of information and almost no image or scheme. Also, no one could focus on what he was saying because he spoke in a very low volume. When someone tried to ask a question, he was very rude because he did not like to be interrupted. This created a very awful mood during the course and discussions about the subject were becoming less and less frequent. For the final exam, everybody just memorized the content of the presentations and after one day, no one remember anything about the course. This experience taught me that discussion between the students and the professor is very important for the learning process.
In sum, though some may prefers classes without discussion, less lectures and more conversation are great for students and professors. Not only we will be able to discuss deeper ideas but also is less boring and more interesting. Everyone should try, at least one time, to take a class with a lot of discussion and see its benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | hnftskn | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | prayashpathak | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | hilmi | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | hilmi | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | Lao Zhiquan | 86 | view |
- Endangered SpeciesMany environmentalists support the current system of laws that works to save all species that may become extinct. They claim that the current variety of organisms that exist on Earth must be preserved. This idea has long been held as our 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 604, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'tell'
Suggestion: tell
...oard. The only thing that Tomas did was telling us the theme and them we started a disc...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[5]
Message: You should probably use: 'were'.
Suggestion: were
...after Tomas' classes. That classes was a three hour course on the last time sl...
^^^
Line 4, column 61, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun lectures is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...may prefers classes without discussion, less lectures and more conversation are grea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, so, at least, for example, for instance, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2446.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92152917505 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83088938585 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48893360161 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 750.6 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.8016042754 48.9658058833 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.3571428571 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.82142857143 5.45110844103 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351770056632 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904782701983 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929854459636 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243119285011 0.150856017488 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892768105186 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.