Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the contemporary world, young adults are approaching a wide variety of styles to focus on studies. If I were asking about listening style, I would prefer the open discussion with others in the class instead of merely listening. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
The first reason is understing the subject. Students in the discussion classes often share their knowledge and experience with their classmates during the discussion session, and it makes the subject easy to understand. On top of that, the professor in the group class shares their personal experiences to understand the topic and helpful for students to remember for a long time. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was studying my high school, at Omak public school, I attended language classes every evening. In my class, a total of ten students from different nations and everybody have their strategies to learn English. Some people started from scratch; such as from the basic grammar to sentence development, but others write essay first and then correcting grammar mistakes. When I was studying that class, everyone in the class discusses the advantages and drawbacks of their strategies and that makes it easy for me to understand English.
Secondly, classes with open discussion never get boar. It is evident because everyone in the class keeps on raising questions, and others share their opinion. As a result, the class is more engaging and stimulate the student's mind for a long time to concentrate on the class. For instance, when I was studying for a master’s at Ohio state university, my chemistry professor often gave us powerpoint presentations as an assignment. Every day at the end of the class, students have to present their work in front of the class and others as an opportunity to raise their voice. What’s more, classes are more fun, and people in the class make comments on others presentation. Overall, discussion classes are more fun learning compare to only listening classes.
In conclusion, classes with open discussion are preferable. This is because of easy to understand the subject and more fun. I suggest people take group discussion classes to make their student life fun and to gain more knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | hnftskn | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | prayashpathak | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | hilmi | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | hilmi | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | Lao Zhiquan | 86 | view |
- the argument on the online edition of the encyclopedia. the reading claims that online edition has several drawbacks over traditional books. 81
- human believes on elephant 65
- Fuel-cell engine over internal-combation engin 71
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement?television advertising directed towards young adult should not be allowed. Use specific reasons to support your answer 70
- Imagine you if a professor or a lecture given you the wrong information to the audience, when did you ask the question?During the meeting or after the meeting. 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 661, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...nd people in the class make comments on others presentation. Overall, discussion class...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06100795756 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81545713765 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498673740053 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0613475139 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8571428571 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9523809524 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273724423932 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917616949445 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673145738459 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175933515112 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256828473195 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.