Sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The group will be helped more by person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by person who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that doing projects by a group have profound positive effects on the quality of the project’s results. Although some people believe that members of a group have to insist on their ideas. They have the idea that novel ideas form through insisting, as we have seen such similar experiences among prominent scientists. However, I have a different point of view. As far as I am concerned, in order for group members to be prosperous, they have to move in the whole group’s dimension. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first and foremost reason to be mentioned is that when an individual enrolls in a group, in fact, he or she accepts the group’s rules. By doing this, the whole of the group will have only one goal. By obeying rules, not only can all the individuals work properly, but also they would able to convey their ideas to the group in a better way as well. To shed light on this matter, I want to mention an example of my personal experience. When I was at the university, our professor divided students into several distinct groups in order to work on our assigned project. One of the group members was always insisting on his ideas, while other members totally disagreed with him. We always were putting our energy and wasting our time to persuade him to work with other group members. Unfortunately, our grades suffered drastically.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that nowadays, companies hire a person who has team working abilities. In fact, such an ability is even more important than being talented. So, all of us should increase our team working ability in order to be successful in finding a decent job in the future. Based on a recently revealed research in the field of psychology, it shows that almost all people who are not the ability to work with others are prone to unemployment during most of their lives. This research clearly shows the importance of team working ability.
To make a long story short, one can conclude that because of my personal experience regarding this issue, and a noteworthy research in this field, all of the people need to extend their team working abilities, and it is also better for the group to collaborate with such people, otherwise, the negative impacts of being such people in the group is unavoidable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | sepehrdsafaee | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | neriman | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | 3063245467 | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | as | 90 | view |
| 2019-01-31 | mariem | 70 | view |
- University students are often encouraged to study fields in which significant job growth a large increase in job opportunities is expected these fields currently include science technology engineering and math do you believe students should consider study 87
- TPO48 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important ways to improve the people’s health is to clean the environment. 76
- TPO 42 76
- Sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The group will be helped more by person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by person who often strongly insists tha 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... quality of the project's results. Although some people believe that members of a g...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e into the most outstanding reasons. The first and foremost reason to be ment...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 694, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'were'.
Suggestion: were always
... members totally disagreed with him. We always were putting our energy and wasting our time...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ely, our grades suffered drastically. Another reason which deserves some words...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recently revealed research'.
Suggestion: recently revealed research
...ng a decent job in the future. Based on a recently revealed research in the field of psychology, it shows th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... importance of team working ability. To make a long story short, one can conc...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'noteworthy research'.
Suggestion: noteworthy research
...al experience regarding this issue, and a noteworthy research in this field, all of the people need t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...nd a noteworthy research in this field, all of the people need to extend their team workin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uch people in the group is unavoidable.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, well, while, as for, as to, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7734939759 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66658271509 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530120481928 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.5037776721 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.05 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34401160801 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961914534827 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058266522531 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189710059562 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652903075864 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.