Students aged 13-18 are taught different subjects by different teachers while younger students are taught by only one teacher all day long. Some people suggest it would benefit young students to be taught by different teachers. Do you agree with this view? Why or why not?
It is widely accepted that school plays a prominent role in every students’ educational life. In this regard, there is a long-standing discussion among academicians about teaching younger students by different teachers or just by one teacher. I firmly contend that teaching by multiple teachers’ advantages carry more weight. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through three noticeable reasons.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that everybody cannot be professional in all fields of knowledge. Every teacher, based on their educational life, would be knowledgeable in a few fields, so they can be more effective in teaching these fields. Therefore, having different teachers for younger students is an essential element for providing them with profound knowledge which every teacher is specialized in it. To illustrate this with an example, if a teacher has studied math as his or her main major, they are able to give deep information about different math theories or concepts, and they can apply different methods to help students to get new information much easier and effective. On the other side, if the teacher tries to teach other courses like history or art, they will not be able to provide sufficient knowledge for students which in result causes the students would not learn these subjects in a proper way.
Another equally noteworthy point supporting this opinion is that the more having relationship with others the more enhancing individual’s social skills. As a matter of fact, in the contemporary world having good social skill’s benefits are not hidden from anybody. In this regard, schools could help younger students to boost their social abilities in different ways. One of them is using different teachers. In the research which has been conducted in Sharif university, two groups of students, the first group were thought all of their courses just by one teacher and the second group by different teachers, has been investigated. At the end of the research, the second group which was exposed to different teachers had a very great ability in communicating with others. This research has shown that having various teachers help students to expand their social and communication skills in many effective ways, which will help them to manage their future communications impressively.
Furthermore, by using different teachers, the students’ skills will be discovered in different aspects accurately. Since every teacher pays attention to some specific features of every student, so it will provide more opportunities for students to be discovered their abilities. Actually, every teacher can gather some information about the strengthens and weaknesses of every student, and by sharing it with other teachers, they will be more able to identify every students’ abilities. For example, one of my friends has a great taste in art. When she was a student, her parents just focused on her math abilities. When the teachers gave their feedbacks, her art teacher provided a great report which showed how she was very talented in art courses. Finally, her parents found that they were wrong and tried to pave her way to get more knowledge of art. Now, she is one of the best musicians in our city. Have her art teacher not shared his opinion, my friend might never be a famous musician.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that having multi teachers which every of them are skillful in a specific field, not only help the students to get in-depth knowledge, but also help them to extend their skills in communicating with others which enhance their ability to handle their future communication in a more efficient way.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-23 | sepehrdsafaee | 76 | view |
2019-11-03 | nikhil2798.gp | 66 | view |
2019-10-20 | NegarMaghsoudi | 73 | view |
2019-10-20 | NegarMaghsoudi | 73 | view |
2019-10-10 | Yuson | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Telephone has greater influence on people’s lives than television has 90
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 73
- Students aged 13-18 are taught different subjects by different teachers while younger students are taught by only one teacher all day long. Some people suggest it would benefit young students to be taught by different teachers. Do you agree with this view 73
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 73
- Students aged 13-18 are taught different subjects by different teachers while younger students are taught by only one teacher all day long. Some people suggest it would benefit young students to be taught by different teachers. Do you agree with this view 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 920, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...students would not learn these subjects in a proper way. Another equally noteworthy point ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, so, then, therefore, for example, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3157.0 1977.66487455 160% => OK
No of words: 606.0 407.700716846 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2095709571 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96155895361 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93142143002 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46204620462 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 958.5 618.680645161 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.7859530257 48.9658058833 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.423076923 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42307692308 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308522281985 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101130335793 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763301107099 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188981265621 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590715822196 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.