Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
“success” is determined in the terms of one’s achievements in his life or profession. It is a valuable social attribute for its owner bringing him credit and confidence. Hence, almost every individual tries his best to be called successful in his career. Knowing the importance and popularity of success the question striking to mind is how successful people act, they try new things accepting their risks or they do what they know how to do well. The answer can be viewed from different perspectives which I elaborate upon in ensuing paragraphs.
The first outlook suggests the incontrovertibly axiomatic fact of innovation, being the key to progress, equally, taking risks being an inevitable part of trying to be creative. This fact is even more tangible in today’s modern world than it used to be in the past. These days, we witness so many new-found companies, the key of which successes, is being the first to offer a new plan in their field. If no one first dares to do something in spite of its risks, that work will never be done. And this is awful, specially, when it comes to development in technology. And successful people also know this fact. Thus, they try to do new things and take risks in many aspects of their occupation.
Not quite compatible with the first perspective, the second one indicates how important accomplishing a job accurately is in success in that job. It goes without saying that doing a job for the first time and without any previous familiarity causes the result to be more likely to fail. And successful people often spare no effort to avoid failure. Consequently, they seem to be cautious about what they do and what they plan. They want the damages and losses in their work to be at their minimum levels. To fulfill such requirements, they should do what they are really skilled at and know how to do it well. Accordingly, sometimes successful people should choose to do a job in which they are experienced over the new one with its obvious risks.
Considering both viewpoints, there is no absolute unique answer to the aforesaid question in my opinion. Successful people may choose one way over the other one in every distinct situation. I think their choices in every situation varies as much that their total manner cannot be concluded, generally and it totally depends on the person, himself, and the case he is confronting to choose what to do.
- TPO 45 3
- TPO 47 integrated 76
- TPO 20Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 698, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ks in many aspects of their occupation. Not quite compatible with the first pers...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, look, may, really, second, so, thus, well, i think, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84745762712 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87826965564 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535108958838 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1121338593 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7727272727 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353274852191 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103435560504 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116817550863 0.0737576698707 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21518218662 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836178927127 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.