Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.
In today’s extremely competitive world, there are several varied reasons for a person to be successful. In this vein, there has always been a controversial debate over the notion of whether successful people try new things and take risks or merely doing what they are aware of how to do well. Personally speaking, I hold that almost most of them do not take risks and do only things they know how to do finely. My viewpoint is based on a few reasons, two compelling ones of which have been elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, there are many successful people these days than ever before thanks to colleges and academics since people first learn the knowledge of what they are supposed to do in near future. As current jobs and affairs have become scientific and specialized, no longer can people succeed only by taking risks and chances. Given the competitive environment existed in the business world, it is necessary for individuals to have sufficient knowledge and information about their favourite jobs to be superior to others. When we notice the resume and background of successful people in any position, it is crystal clear that almost all of them have received a high scientific degree in the best academics and have experience enough in their speciality. Although we see a very limited handful of person that has succeeded without any knowledge and qualification, their number compared to successful Educated and knowledgeable individuals are very minimal and negligible. Therefore, considering information existed in evidence and statistics, there are many opportunities and chances for learned and knowledgeable people to succeed in doing what they are supposed to do in their future jobs.
Furthermore, another equally important reason which should be mentioned is that the individuals who take risks and resort to chance and doing new things in order to succeed are more likely susceptible to bankruptcy and corruptions. Although a scant number of them maybe have become successful, almost most of them have suffered irrecoverable loss and severe frustration. In contrast, if a person ascends the stairs of science and experience step by step, he or she is more likely to be successful in the long run and this way bolster their confidence to keep on the path to success. My experience is a good example of what I mean. Three years ago, my close friends blindly invested by buying stocks of a company when they found that our professor had benefited from this way. After a while, the company would go to bankruptcy and they lost their assets. Although our professor had the required knowledge of this kind of investment and entered it at the best possible time, my friends took risks and rashly go on the track they did not know how to do. Had they got information about it, they would never have fallen into such a predicament.
In a nutshell, having considered all the aforementioned reasons, I firmly agree that people should do only things they are aware of how to do well in order to be successful.
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well 73
- It is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 94
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 70
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 73
- Nowadays children rely too much on the technology like computers smartphone video games for fun and entertainment playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children s development 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, i mean, in contrast, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2529.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 509.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96856581532 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84098264189 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493123772102 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 795.6 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.3679207502 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.105263158 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7894736842 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429291414908 0.236089414692 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130076575082 0.076458572812 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151087033932 0.0737576698707 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305843148335 0.150856017488 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125721005351 0.0645574589148 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.