TASK 2: Nowadays more and more people have access to the Internet. But constant availability of any information worsens people's memory and critical thinking skills.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no doubt that humans can access and gather lots of information they need easily online which can help people's lives become comfortable. However, some people believe that always having a bunch of information to access will have many disadvantages for humans. I strongly advocate this idea because this will damage human memories and their critical thinking skills.
To begin with, people will become passive and lazy due to the myriad of data available online. People can easily search and find the solution to the problem they face on google. Doing this for a while will make the human brain tend to believe that it does not need to speculate about any problem. For example, according to my school report, many students say that they prefer having the idea online rather than trusting what they are thinking. This implies that people’s critical thinking skills will decrease and their creativity will either negatively affect students, especially the ones studying in the architectural field.
Another drawback is that with the numberless pieces of information on the internet, human brains will use fewer and become less productive. On the internet, people can easily find thousands of different websites containing the details they need; therefore, people will run to collect the data they need without any deliberation. For instance, people, who rely on the internet too much, will not make any effort to think about the answer when facing any problems. This will harm people's skills in deliberating the information that is suitable for humans to obtain. Besides that, people might be less confident; for example, if once the information from the internet is wrong and students get bad grades, they might not trust in their choice for the next time and gradually lose confidence in their choice.
In conclusion, having the internet as a support method to learn is good. However, humans should not always rely on tools if they do not want to be passive, lose some important thinking skills, or just accept other ideas without any new creation.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer agree the professors have more mo 76
- An American film actor once said Tomorrow is important and precious Some people think individuals and society should pay more attention to the future than to the present Do you agree or disagree 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TASK 2 Nowadays more and more people have access to the Internet But constant availability of any information worsens people s memory and critical thinking skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09467455621 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4997041245 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556213017751 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9552297483 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.8 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5333333333 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228940043617 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867840763622 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329709042537 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150268898303 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348049355116 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.