Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
There is no doubt that teachers have a great role to grow up children in every society. In addition, teachers like other people have their own viewpoints regarding different matters such as economics, politics, to name a few. There has been much debate among educational officials on whether teachers have to be allowed to talk about their own viewpoints in classrooms or not. Personally speaking, I contend the latter is more beneficial for whole society. I will elaborate on my point of view through the following paragraphs.
All know that the most important task of teachers is teaching essential materials to students during classroom time as well as teaching students how to behave well a in group of people, whether at schools or universities. In fact, when teachers enter their personal perspectives regarding challenging issues in classrooms, they disturb the main goal of education to minor issues. I remember whenever one of my teachers make his own political views in the classroom, an extensive debate formed and I was not able to get information from the teacher. Under these circumstances, teachers often are not able to control the class due to the fact that the debate is much challenging and involves many students especially in university's classrooms.
In addition, it should be noted that students in primary school or even a part of students in high school are not enough mature to distinguish between the truth and the false, and they lack the ability to analyze the complicated matters like adults; therefore it is possible to happen a contradiction between parent's and teacher's points of view for them. The students are not enough mature to distinguish that every person speaks about events from the position he/she sees them. These contradictions can be resulted in challenges with parents and even other students which are not appropriate for that age.
In light of aforementioned details regarding the showing own perspectives regarding challenging matters in classrooms such as political and social matters, I would strongly believe that it has to be prohibited by officials. It is clear that in spite of some pros of this issue, its disadvantages outweigh the benefits.
- At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 92
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 80
- Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. 65
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 69
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to become financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at young age Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...as teaching students how to behave well a in group of people, whether at schools ...
^
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are often
...er. Under these circumstances, teachers often are not able to control the class due to th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, therefore, well, as to, in addition, in fact, no doubt, such as, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17318435754 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94149861371 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553072625698 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.5138973309 48.9658058833 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.285714286 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316120618336 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086373721472 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633431522037 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159648066855 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671680603133 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.