In times of an economic crisis, in which area should governments reduce its spending? 1. Arts 2. Scientific research 3. Parks and public gardens.
There is nothing to doubt that economy had play an extremely important role in our life. During the time when economic crisis happen, government need to reduce the spending on a specific area in order to recover the economy in a country. Among the three choices show in the prompt, I think the area government should reduce is arts.
To begin with, scientific research plays an extremely important part in modern life. To be more specific, many resources we are using nowadays had been discover by scientific research. Without it, our life can become a totally different world. For instance, gasoline is the main source for cars to move. Therefore, it is important to observe where and how to pump out the gasoline. By doing scientific research, researchers can find to not just where the gasoline located, also the method of pumping it from deep under the ground. As a result, scientific research is crucial for people’s life, so the government should not reduce the spending on scientific research.
In addition, parks and public gardens are beneficial for people. In modern life, people are always busy for rather works or studies. Therefore, when people go to the parks or gardens to relax and breathe some fresh air. Beside, some parks is actually large, so people can even exercise in there such as jogging or playing basketball. Take me as an example, there is a huge park near my house. Every time when I finish studying, I like to go to the park and play some sports with my friends. It makes me feel extremely relaxing. Besides, people can also plant trees in the park or garden. By planting trees, it will decrease the air pollution because trees will absorb carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas. Indeed, parks and gardens are not only beneficial for people, but also profitable for the environment.
Undoubtedly, some people may say that the government should reduce the spending on rather scientific research or parks and public garden, because scientific research can cause lots of money and parks and public garden is not needed for people . However, I think art contain the least benefits for people, because not every person can appreciate the painting. Therefore, spending money on arts can be a waste of money. As a result, the government should reduce the spending on arts in order to recover the economic crisis.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-03 | Steven Huang | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with this statement: Technology designed to make people’s lives simpler often turns out to make them more complicated. 66
- glass 70
- humperback whales 73
- Many companies sell products or services but at the same time cause environment damage. Someone said that it could be stopped by asking them to pay the penalty, such as higher tax, when they cause the environment damage. Others said there are better ways 70
- What is the most important ability for high school teachers who teach young students ( ages 15-18)?1.The ability to give advice to students about future planing.2.The ability to recognise students who need the most help and provide help.3.The ability to e 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 152, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'discovered'.
Suggestion: discovered
...esources we are using nowadays had been discover by scientific research. Without it, our...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 243, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d public garden is not needed for people . However, I think art contain the least ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in addition, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90428211587 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56717163288 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501259445844 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6712033721 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.125 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5416666667 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366737356257 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952759530177 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103770000131 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231323272802 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0946866920527 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.