I think that at universities, sports and other social activities are important along with classes and libraries because they contribute to the holistic development of an individual's personality. However, I disagree with the statement that they should receive funding equal to that of allotted for classes and libraries for certain reasons.
First, the establishment of universities and colleges are primarily aimed at providing quality education for students. Classes, libraries and laboratories comprise major resources for education in a university. Hence, a large share of the funding should go for constructing, developing and renovating the facilities that support education. If equal share is given to sports and social activities we fall short of funding for our core purpose.
Second, there is a limitless scope for improvement or augmentation in research funding and library facilities. It has been proved on numerous occasions that universities that spend huge amount of funds for research and development have yielded excellent research output. For example, last year in our university, where I hold a position as a student representative in the university finance committee, we had surplus funding from the government. Instead of spending the extra money on sports and social activities, we allocated the same towards introducing a technical projects presentation program in our classes from next year. This initiative benefits students in developing their technical skills. Encouraging students and faculty by providing them higher perks for excellence in academic education and research motivates them to achieve greater success.
Based on the above two reasons, I believe that though sports and other recreational activities are important, providing excellent education (and maybe research) should be the primary motive that universities and college should strive for and this should be reflected by allocating greater share of funding towards education. Hence, I think that sports and social activities do not deserve financial support equal to that of classes and libraries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ibute to the holistic development of an individuals personality. However, I disagree with t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'for example', 'i think']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.282352941176 0.229887763892 123% => OK
Verbs: 0.147058823529 0.158761421928 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.114705882353 0.0866891130778 132% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0147058823529 0.046263068375 32% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.05 0.0685040099705 73% => OK
Prepositions: 0.144117647059 0.118717715034 121% => OK
Participles: 0.0588235294118 0.0351676179071 167% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.06909895985 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0147058823529 0.0309702414327 47% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0647058823529 0.0887237588012 73% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0147058823529 0.0209618222197 70% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00882352941176 0.0139019557991 63% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2099.0 2387.08602151 88% => OK
No of words: 312.0 408.028673835 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.72756410256 5.86048508987 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48200974243 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.480769230769 0.338922669872 142% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.407051282051 0.251872472559 162% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.291666666667 0.174417080927 167% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.211538461538 0.112833075102 187% => Too many words length more than 8 chars.
Word Length SD: 3.06909895985 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548076923077 0.524397521467 105% => OK
Word variations: 57.6715347544 59.2087087015 97% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6684587814 68% => OK
Sentence length: 22.2857142857 20.5533526081 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.255112584 48.84282405 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.928571429 120.699889404 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.5533526081 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 0.644075263715 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 62.9908424908 45.7405998639 138% => OK
Elegance: 2.29166666667 1.45489161554 158% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379704400356 0.300154397459 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.125263342528 0.103427244359 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0668996875817 0.0752933317313 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.551635228392 0.497263757937 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.15997221688 0.151897553556 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164856425488 0.114077575197 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945171523053 0.0781384742642 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.377638743404 0.336927656856 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0403766534839 0.067059652881 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28842429612 0.210909579961 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743025395773 0.0618886996521 120% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8870967742 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.6433691756 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.