Friends have an important part in our social lives. Whether we consider our relationship precisely or not, there are some factors with which our relationships formed. Some people hold the view that truth is the most prominent factor affecting our relationships while others may take an opposite viewpoint. Based my own experience, I strongly subscribe to the idea that states truth is the root of a good relationship. I will elaborate on my view for some noticeable reasons.
First, honesty makes a better relationship between friends. The more we are honest, the more trustworthy relationships we have and it helps unconsciously to improve our relationships. Truth provides a secure (safe, warm, friendly) atmosphere among friends who want to have best moments with each other. Whether we want or not, being honest with friends expand our relationships that we did not have any plan to make them in the future. To illustrate, I want to mention my own experience related to this issue. I have a lot of friends in my hometown who I have met in different stages of my life that passed in various situations. Although until now, I have some connections with most of them, only a few ones who are more honest to me still are the best friends. As time passes on, I more believe in truth and its effects on the relationships that I have had and I want to have. Therefore, it should be said again that there is a direct link between honesty and good relationships.
Alongside with the first reason mentioned above, honesty not only strengthens our relationships but also it causes to make a new one. Needless to say that, we have not made all our friendships by ourselves. When we have some honest and reliable friends who also have some other close friends with who we are not familiar and are very honest too, it is always possible to meet them in a ceremony or party by chance. As a result, honesty which is the central part of these relationships such as chain connections, play a significant role in making a large group of friends who we are interested to spend more time with them than others. When I was a bachelor student in the mechanical engineering department, I have some good friends who studied the similar major too. Some students came from different high schools or cities and some lived in the dormitory. So, they also have some friends who were in other departments and studied different majors. After a while, we got to know some of those thanks to these mutual friends. Now I am one member of the group consisted of my close friends in the university who I met that time. This experience taught me that the more honest we are in our relationships, many more friends we could find.
Taking all the aforementioned reason into account (no comma) leads us to conclude that truth is the essential factor in our relationships. Based on what has mentioned above, not only does it enhance our relationships but it also helps us to find new reliable and honest friends. Consequently, I highly recommend that honesty should be more taken into account as the other parameters in our relationships.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: iPass
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 266, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the best'.
Suggestion: have the best
...ly atmosphere among friends who want to have best moments with each other. Whether we wan...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'making'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: making
...ns our relationships but also it causes to make a new one. Needless to say that, we hav...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more honest we are in our relationships, many more friends we could find. Taking...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, while, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 77.0 43.0788530466 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2562.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 540.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74444444444 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85142132392 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464814814815 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 807.3 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3503808935 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8888888889 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 11.8709677419 202% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0879882089435 0.236089414692 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0311700641055 0.076458572812 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293740813467 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0678857993585 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219202612505 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.