People always take different factors into account in their relationship like honesty, responsibility, and so on that of all them, telling the truth is usually known by far the most important consideration. However, in my opinion, telling truth is a relative concept and it should be considered differently in the specific situations people are exposed to.
First, it is generally accepted that the truth plays a vital role in the durability of any relationship between family members, especially spouses. Truth can be represented as the exact nature of objects, in another word, the precise representation of any matter in life. Thus, the knowledge of that leads to trustworthy between people. Indeed. Anything which is related to people in any relationship may have a direct effect on other people and therefore when people know the whole of the truth about matters they feel comfortable. Furthermore, in hard conditions, they can help each other. In a family, for instance, if a wife loses her job and tells the truth to her husband her spouse can help her in overcoming the problem.
Second, sometimes telling the truth leads to some undesirable effect like damaging the relationship itself. Imagine the relationship of a father, who suffers from cancer, and his children. If the father told his children that he will die the children would be depressed. I think the real truth in these harsh conditions is that how people can maintain their fine and happy relationship no matter what is the truth about any bad situation is going to happen.
In conclusion, the concept of truth is a matter of contentious and this affects the decision of people that whether or not they should always tell truth in a relationship. It is my deep conviction that the honesty of people closely depends upon the situation they are exposed to.
- Some famous athletes and entertainers earn millions of dollars every year Do you think these people deserve such high salaries Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 85
- Some people think with the development of technology and Internet, libraries will disappear while others think libraries are always necessary. Which idea do you agree with, and please give specific details to support your opinion. 86
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- TPO-35 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- TPO-50 Integrated toefl writing 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...at leads to trustworthy between people. Indeed. Anything which is related to people in...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... suffers from cancer, and his children. If the father told his children that he wi...
^^
Line 8, column 109, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...his affects the decision of people that whether or not they should always tell truth in a rela...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02295081967 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88741721577 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554098360656 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2131817046 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.428571429 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172220500251 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625679724443 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435191123557 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110226529569 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209989279047 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.