The essential question of the prompt is whether telling the truth should be considered to be the most important consideration in human’s relationship. Some people if asked would elaborate on the importance of truth between people, while others would mention respect, patience and love as equally valuable considerations. As far as I’m concerned, I adopt the firm position that having all four abovementioned elements in one’s relationship is going to make for brilliant relationship and none of them can be singled out as most important.
One reason to claim the necessity of respect in one’s relationship is because without respect there can be no good relationships. One person can be absolutely honest with another but disrespect him which erodes relationships and eventually will lead to a break up. To illustrate that idea let’s consider the following example. I remember my first childhood friend Mark. He was as honest as man can be because he was raised that way. He never cheated in our games, never lied to his parents or peers and always was regarded byt outlookers as the standart for honesty. But he didn’t know a thing about respect. He treated people and myself in particular as inferior. I certainly had my dignity and we occassionaly had quarrels which contributed to worsing of our friendship. In the end I parted with him and has never since he managed to restore our relationship.
Admittely, despite all reasonable evidence of the contrary, some people might argue that honesty is the pillar of any relationship on the premise that honest relatinship makes for inner happiness. And since happiness is what all people strive for one should consider telling the truth as crucial element. However, such position should be taken with a grain of salt. Those assertions are likely to be made under the assumption that honesty always leads to happy relationship which in fact is not true. Indeed, a research by VM in Ukraine together with my own observations has provided me with a clear picture of people having unhappy relationships because of the lack of love in them. So love is what makes people feel great. In the essence of love no cheering relationships are possible.
In summary, while there are various perspectives and viewpoints on the issue, it is clear that there are more supporting arguments to claim that honesty, respect, love and patience are mandatory to happy relationships then to posit the point of separating telling the truth as the most important consideration in any relationship. I suggest that maybe people having unhappy and troublesome relationships consider the other elements I’ve mentioned and try to incorporate them in their relationship. After that, we may have more smiling and cheerful people on the streets. After all, isn’t it what everybody wants?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...ship which in fact is not true. Indeed, a research by VM in Ukraine together with my own o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, so, then, while, after all, in fact, in particular, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2386.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17570498915 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04585286299 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524945770065 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 748.8 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.6256732463 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4166666667 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2083333333 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160339567098 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431789819319 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456471453488 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110235394619 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357527662656 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.